The Tivoli Fountain on a Warm Spring Day

(Photo Courtesy: Erica Hallock)

Trivia!

Prior to the Legislature moving to annual legislative sessions in 1980, bi-annual sessions ran for how many days?

Highlights of the Week

Revamped Revenue Approach on the Table

After Governor Ferguson conveyed his unwillingness to support a “wealth tax” to help close the state budget gap at an April 1st press conference, legislative budget writers went back to the drawing board. This week they unveiled a revised revenue package that is estimated to raise $12 billion over four years. As a reminder, the state’s four-year budget gap is an estimated $16 billion.

This Washington State Standard article summarizes this revised legislative approach.

While a number of revenue bills are in play, five primary pieces currently make up the revised Senate and House revenue packages. They include:

• SB 5812 (Wellman)/HB 2049 (Bergquist) K-12 Education Funding/Property Tax
  • These companion bills increase the revenue growth limit for state and local property taxes to fund K-12 education
• SB 5813 (C. Wilson)/HB 2082 (Street) Increase Funding to the Education Legacy Trust Account/Capital Gains & Estate Tax Increases
  • Adds an additional 2.9% excise tax on capital gains in excess of $1M
  • Increases the top tier rates on estate tax by 35% and increases the exclusion amount for the estate tax to $3M
• SB 5815 (Saldana)/HB 2081 (Fitzgibbon) Increase Business & Occupations (B&O) Tax
  • Increases tax rate for several Business & Occupations (B&O) Tax Surcharges
  • Includes an increase of the B&O rate for child care from .484% to .5% effective January 1, 2035
  • Imposes surcharge on high grossing businesses and financial institutions
  • Places a .5% tax on Washington taxable income over $250M. Takes effect January 2026 and expires December 31, 2030
• SB 5814 (Frame)/HB 2083 (Stonier) Extend Retails Sales and Use Taxes to Certain Services/One-Time Pre-Payment of Sales Tax Collections
  • Extends retail sales and use tax to certain services
  • Makes certain nicotine products subject to the other tobacco products tax
  • Establishes one-time pre-payment of state sales tax collections for businesses with $3M or more in taxable retail sales during calendar year 2026. Pre-payment in June 2027 for July 2027 taxes. Effect is to pull ~$800M in sales tax revenue into the 2025-27 biennium
• SB 5794 (Salomon)/HB 2084 (Ramel) Repeal or Modification of Certain Tax Preferences
  • These bills repeal, modify or clarify a number of tax exemptions to raise additional revenue

The Senate Ways and Means Committee held a public hearing on most of its revenue bills on Wednesday, April 16, and is scheduled to take executive action on Friday, April 18. The House Finance Committee is scheduled to hold both public hearings and executive sessions on Friday, April 18.

All of these revenue bills are “Necessary to Implement the Budget,” and, therefore, not subject to legislative timelines, but still need to go through all of the normal channels and be approved by both bodies.

On April 17, Governor Ferguson issued his response to the revenue package. Of note, he expressed concern that the Legislature’s approach continues to rely on too high a level of new revenue. The statement did not include a specific target revenue figure, and the reader could infer he prefers further cuts rather than the proposed level of revenue.

Specifically, he stated:

“At a time of great economic uncertainty and assaults by the Trump Administration on core state services for working families, raising $12 billion in taxes is unsustainable, too risky and fails to adequately prepare Washington state for the crisis that looms ahead.

That said, the Legislature has made progress on key issues in its updated revenue proposals. Legislators are working hard and putting in long hours. They have moved away from their reliance on an untested wealth tax and made progress on addressing our regressive tax system.

We will continue to work together to produce a budget that supports a strong economy, and the people of Washington.”

“It’s the Final Cutoff”

As a nod to the Blue Origin “space trip” this week, I wrote this title line while singing Europe’s “The Final Countdown” in my head. I will forever be a child of the 1980s – best music, no question.

Wednesday, April 16 at 5:00 p.m. was the final cutoff with the deadline for bills to pass out of the opposite chamber. In other words, House bills had to be passed by the Senate and Senate bills passed by the House. Bills “Necessary to Implement the Budget” are not subject to these cutoff deadlines.

Per the usual pattern this session, the House had a number of late night/early morning workdays, while the latest the Senate worked was, maybe, 7:00 p.m. one day.

Check out Start Early’s Bill Tracker to get the latest bill statuses.

Process Check-In

1. What Happens After a bill has passed both the House and the Senate?

The answer depends on whether the bill was amended in the opposite chamber.

If a bill was not amended in the opposite chamber, the bill is sent to the Governor for his consideration after receiving signatures of the President of the Senate and Speaker of the House.

If the bill was amended in the opposite chamber, it must return to the originating chamber for a process called “Concurrence” where the originating body is asked to agree to the amendments made in the opposite chamber. For example, if a House bill is amended in the Senate, it must return to the House so the House can concur with the Senate amendments. If concurrence occurs, the bill makes its way to the Governor’s desk. Much of the focus of these final days of session will be spent in this process of Concurrence.

2. What Happens when the House of Origin Does Not Concur with the Opposite Chamber’s Amendments?

If the original chamber does not agree with the amendments made in the other body, it can request that the opposite chamber withdraw – or recede – their amendments.

If the opposite chamber refuses to recede, a conference committee including representatives from each chamber may be formed. This conference committee works to resolve differences and ultimately produce a conference committee report outlining this resolution. Both the Senate and House must adopt the conference committee report for the bill to pass (in other words, it is an up or down vote). If the conference committee does not come to an agreement or if one of the chambers does not agree with the conference report, the bill fails. Because conference committees take time and energy in the waning days of session, creation of conference committees are not taken lightly.

Revenue Collections Update

On April 14, the state’s Economic and Revenue Forecast Council released an Economic and Revenue Update. Of note, major General Fund-State (GF-S) revenue collections for the March 11 – April 10, 2025, collection period came in $76.7 million (3.8%) lower than forecasted. A large part of this comes from real estate excise tax (REET) collections which came in $17.4 million (14.7%) lower than forecasted.

Spring arrives on the Capitol Campus

(Photo Courtesy: Erica Hallock)

Trivia!

What event on Saturday, September 9, 1928, caused massive damage to the Old Capitol Building in Downtown Olympia?

Highlights of the Week

Early Learning Facilities Bill Signed Into Law!

On Monday, April 7, Governor Bob Ferguson signed HB 1314 (Callan/Abbarno) into law. The Senate companion bill was sponsored by Senators Trudeau and Torres.

The bill makes four primary changes to the Early Learning Facilities (ELF) Fund:

1. Establishes an emergency grant program for projects necessitated by unforeseen circumstances (such as burst pipes).
2. Eases the burden on financially constrained providers by moderating matching fund requirements.
3. Makes Tribal Compact Schools eligible for the ELF Public School Districts Program.
4. Clarifies that projects supporting the conversion of ECEAP slots to full day and/or extended day are eligible for ELF Fund programs.

The law goes into effect July 27, 2025.

Opposite Fiscal Committee Cutoff Deadline – Back to Floor Action

Final Stretch! Fiscal committee action concluded on Tuesday, April 8 with the deadline for fiscal committees to act on bills from the opposite body. On Wednesday, activity shifted back to the Legislative Building for what feels like endless Floor sessions in advance of the April 16 “Opposite House Cutoff.” At the same time legislators are deliberating the final lists of bills, budget writers are negotiating budget details.

Given the hours spent standing on unforgiving marble floors, I, for one, am glad fashionable tennis shoes are considered acceptable footwear.

Bill Updates

Bill to Modify Fair Start for Kids Act Advances

The House Appropriations Committee took executive action on ESSB 5752 (C. Wilson) on its final day of committee work, April 8. This bill looks to modify aspects of the Fair Start for Kids Act to achieve cost savings given the state’s budget constraints. See the March 28 Notes from Olympia for further background on the bill’s details.

Prior to executive action, the Appropriations Committee adopted further amendments that serve to further align the bill with the House’s approach to child care in its proposed budget.

Specifically, the amendments:

1. Reinstate current law requiring a household’s 12-month Working Connections Child Care authorization begin on the date care is expected to start by removing provisions directing DCYF to adopt rules requiring prospective payments and prohibiting prospective payments for a child who has not attended within the previous month.
2. Modify the school-age pilot project contained in the bill.

The bill now moves to House Rules.

Bill to Modify Child Care Qualifications Passes Senate

On April 8, the Senate passed E2SHB 1648 (Dent) by a unanimous vote. Among other provisions, this bill extends the timeline for childcare providers to meet certain staff qualification requirements from August 1, 2026, to at least August 1, 2030.

See Start Early’s March 28 Notes from Olympia for a description of the bill’s components.

Because the bill was amended in the Senate, it needs to return to the House for concurrence in House amendments.

Transition to Kindergarten Pause Advances to House Rules

On Tuesday, April 8, the House Appropriations Committee took executive action on ESB 5769 (Wellman). This bill would limit Transition to Kindergarten (TTK) enrollment to the level appropriated in the operating budget. (Note both the Senate and House proposed budgets effectively pause TTK enrollment at 2024-25 school year levels).

The bill also requires the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction to work with the Department of Children, Youth and Families to develop recommendations to phase-in TTK enrollment that takes into consideration other early learning programs, including ECEAP, and also limits annual growth to no more than five percent.

The bill calls for the recommendations to consider the following for TTK expansion:

1. Communities with the highest percentage of unmet needs;
2. Child care supply and demand;
3. School districts, charter schools, and state-tribal education compact schools with the highest percentages of students qualifying for free and reduced-price lunch;
4. School districts, charter schools, and state-tribal education compact schools with the highest percentages of students with disabilities; and
5. School districts, charter schools, and state-tribal education compact schools with the lowest kindergarten readiness results on the Washington kindergarten inventory of developing skills.

Amendments adopted in the House Appropriations Committee make two changes to the underlying bill:

1. For the 2025-26 and 2026-27 school years, directs OSPI to prioritize TTK programs that operated during the 2024-25 school year.
2. Changes the due date for the OSPI/DCYF recommendations from December 1, 2027, to December 1, 2026.

The bill now moves to the House Rules Committee.

Check out Start Early’s Bill Tracker for the latest on early learning related bills.

Senate and House Capital Budget Negotiations Commence

On Friday, April 4, the House Capital Budget Committee passed its Capital Budget, SHB 1216 (Tharinger). On Saturday, April 5, the Senate passed its Capital Budget, SSB 5195 (Trudeau) with all Senators present voting in favor. In contrast to the Operating Budget, the Capital Budget is definitely a more bi-partisan affair with budget leads in the Senate touting how the budget serves “One Washington” and giving public nods of appreciation to their counterparts from the other sides of the aisle.

At the House Capital Budget Committee meeting, Chair Tharinger reported the House would not take up the Capital Budget until negotiations are complete. At that time, the compromise will be considered as a striking amendment by the House before it is sent to the Senate.

As a reminder, Start Early developed a document comparing the Senate and House Operating and House budget proposals. It has been updated to reflect the latest Capital and Operating budget action to date.

Gorgeous cherry blossoms fill the Capitol Campus

(Photo Courtesy: Erica Hallock)

Trivia!

1. What type of tree is the “Sine Die” tree?
2. Where is the “Sine Die” tree located on the Capitol Campus?

Highlights of the Week

Senate and House Capital Budgets Released

On March 31, the Senate and House released their respective proposed Capital Budgets, PSSB 5195 (Trudeau) and PSHB 1216 (Tharinger). Below is a summary of key Early Learning Facility (ELF) investments:

The Senate is expected to vote on its Capital Budget on Saturday, April 5 and the House sometime in the following days. After these actions, a conference committee will work to resolve differences and propose a final Capital Budget for both chambers’ consideration.

Potential New Revenue Updates

On Monday, March 31, the Senate Ways and Means Committee held a marathon public hearing on their proposed revenue package and the House Finance Committee did the same on Thursday, April 3. See the March 28 Notes from Olympia for details on the revenue proposals.

In the end, thousands of Washingtonians registered their positions on the 8 revenue bills introduced between the two chambers and hundreds of people testified. In some cases, the same people testified (with the same talking points) on multiple bills. As of this writing, these bills have not been scheduled for executive session.

The morning after the Senate public hearing, Governor Ferguson held a press conference to share his perspective about the Senate and House progress on the operating budget to date. The Washington State Standard has a great recap of the press conference.

Key takeaways from Governor Ferguson’s press conference:

1. Governor Ferguson remains opposed to the inclusion of the “wealth tax” (called the “Financial Intangible Tax”) in the final budget as a way to close the budget gap. The House biennial budget assumes this tax would raise $2.4 billion and the Senate biennial budget assumes it would raise $4.2 billion. The primary reason for the Governor’s opposition to this tax is because he believes it is untested and would not withstand a legal challenge.
2. Governor Ferguson argues both budgets are too reliant on new taxes and additional spending reductions are needed. In short, he said he cannot sign either budget in their current form.

Governor Ferguson cited five components necessary for his approval of a final budget:

1. Protection of the Rainy Day Fund.
2. Basing the budget on realistic revenue projections.
3. Minimizing new investments.
4. Identifying additional new savings and efficiencies.
5. Not relying on a new revenue source with a high likelihood of being overturned by the courts (e.g. the wealth tax).

Governor Ferguson continues to be in discussion and negotiations with legislative leaders and did remain open to other revenue sources, but did not identify which options he supports.

Operating Budget Progress

Over the past week, the Senate and House both approved their budget proposals, with a few amendments ultimately adopted. The process now moves behind closed doors as negotiators work to resolve differences between the two approaches. The “math problem” was made more challenging by Governor Ferguson’s statements this week about revenue and limitations on new expenditures. As you can imagine, anxiety is high on the campus.

Start Early Washington has updated our budget comparison document to reflect Capital Budget details; amendments adopted in committee and on the floor, and to correct errors. Changes are highlighted in yellow, and we will continue to update the document as the process continues.

Bill Updates

Policy Committee Cutoff Reached – On to Fiscal Cutoff!

Tuesday, April 2 marked opposite chamber policy committee cutoff. Because so many bills did not advance this year due to the state’s fiscal situation, our email in-boxes filled with notices of policy committee cancelations as they concluded their work early.

Focus quickly shifted to the April 8 opposite chamber fiscal committee cutoff. While both the Senate Ways and Means and House Appropriations Committees have scheduled Saturday committee meetings, these meetings will be less grueling than the previous pre-cutoff Saturday session due to the lighter bill load. This will give budget writers time to work on budget negotiations.

Check out Start Early’s Bill Tracker for the latest on early learning related bills.

Bill to Change Fair Start for Kids Act Amended in House

On March 28, the House Early Learning and Human Services Committee took executive action on ESSB 5752 (C. Wilson). This bill would make substantial statutory changes to the Fair Start for Kids Act, resulting in significant budget savings reflected in the proposed Senate budget. See the March 28 Notes from Olympia for details on the bill.

The House policy committee approved a striking amendment that made three substantive changes to the underlying bill:

1. Removed the proposed Senate changes to the Working Connections co-payment system. This means the bill now maintains the current co-pay structure.
2. Reinstated eligibility for Working Connections Child Care for people in the first year of a state registered apprenticeship.
3. Required DCYF to work with a school and park district in a specific city on a pilot to increase access to a school-age child care program.

The committee rejected a proposed amendment that would have reinstated eligibility for Working Connections Child Care for children of child care providers, citing budget concerns.

The bill is scheduled for a public hearing in the House Appropriations Committee on Saturday, April 5.

Early Learning Facilities Bill Delivered to Governor Ferguson

Last week we shared that HB 1314 (Callan/Abbarno) had passed both the Senate and House and was on its way to the Governor’s desk for signature. This week the bill received the requisite signatures by the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House, and was delivered to Governor Ferguson on Wednesday, April 2.

Because the bill was delivered more than five days before the Legislature adjourns, Governor Ferguson has five days to act on the bill. While Sundays are not counted, Saturdays are.

In Memoriam
Speaker Frank Chopp, Washington State House of Representatives Longest Serving Speaker of the House
1943-2025

(Photo Courtesy: Seattle Times)

Trivia!

Washington state’s longest-serving Secretary of State Ralph Munro passed away March 20 at the age of 81. Munro hosted a popular, long-running series on TVW. What is the title of this series?

Highlights of the Week

Budgets Released

On March 24, the Senate and House released their respective proposed Operating Budgets, PSSB 5167 (Robinson) and PSHB 1198 (Ormsby). On Tuesday, March 25, Start Early Washington released a comparison of the two bodies’ budgetary approaches to early learning. A few notes:

• The chart has been updated in places since its initial release on Tuesday to include a correction. The link on our Policy Resources page includes the latest version.
• The numbers presented include two years of funding for the 2025-27 biennium. If you would like further detail, please reach out.
• The base of the table is Maintenance Level funding, so any reductions are cost savings achieved from reductions from Maintenance Level and new investments are those above what was included in Maintenance Level.
• While funding for early learning and child care does include reductions, many of these are cost avoidance achieved through delayed implementation of upcoming milestones in the Fair Start for Kids Act. Pending legislation (ESSB 5752/HB 1489) would delay these Fair Start provisions.

Budget Highlights

The Senate’s $78.5 billion 2025-27 biennial budget is predicated upon $3 billion in cuts/reductions and $6.2 billion in new revenue in the upcoming biennium. The budget would tap $1.6 billion from the state’s Rainy Day Fund in State Fiscal Year 2026, with a pledge to pay the funds back in the following fiscal year. The budget includes plans to leave a $7.6 billion reserve at the end of state fiscal year 2029.

The Senate budget proposes state employee furloughs of 13 unpaid days for one year (the equivalent of a 5 percent pay cut). The Senate budget invests more than the House in education (particularly in special education) and does not include the $100 million in new funding for law enforcement that is a priority of Governor Ferguson.

The House’s $77.8 billion 2025-27 biennial budget would leave a total ending fund balance of $3.2 billion. Its budget is predicated upon $5.2 billion in new revenue. The House budget does include new funding for law enforcement and while it includes new funding for education, it includes less than the Senate. The House budget does not include salary reductions or require furlough days for state employees.

Budget Approaches to Early Learning

• Areas of Alignment. The two bodies appear to be in alignment on the major cost drivers – delaying expanded eligibility for ECEAP and Working Connections Child Care; pausing additional Transition to Kindergarten enrollment while preserving current enrollment; and delaying by one year Working Connections Child Care rate increases to the 85th percentile of the 2024 Market Rate Survey (MRS).
• Senate invests more in ECEAP. By frontloading a 10% rate increase in year one, the Senate invests ~$10 million more in ECEAP rates and invests substantially more dollars in ECEAP slot expansion.
• Senate budget reflects ESSB 5752 approach. As expected, the Senate budget reflects the ESSB 5752 approach and includes more specific budget reductions, particularly in Working Connections Child Care “auxiliary” programs, than the House. Of interest, of the $6.5 billion in savings in the Senate budget, the largest line-item comes from ESSB 5752 at 14% of the Senate budget’s total savings.
• Fair Start for Kids Act questions dominated press conferences. In various media availabilities over the past week, the large percentage of budget savings coming from early learning was repeatedly noted by the press, and multiple reporters asked questions about the delay to the Fair Start for Kids Act. Legislators from Majority Leader Pedersen to Ways and Means Chair Robinson to House Finance Chair Berg emphasized both the Senate and House are honoring the Legislature’s commitment with the passage of capital gains by dedicating more than $500 million to early learning, but the budget situation did necessitate delaying the Fair Start for Kids Act provisions. Majority Leader Pedersen said the Fair Start for Kids Act showed the demand for services far exceeded what was projected, leading to costs the budget could not accommodate in this environment.

Check out The Washington State Standard coverage of the budget unveilings.

House Democrats Release Revenue Package; Senate Revenue Proposals Set for Hearings

Shortly after we went to “print” last week, House Democrats released their proposed revenue package. Projected to raise over $13 billion over four years (about $4 billion less than the Senate’s), the package contains three components:

1. Financial Intangible Tax. The Senate has a similar proposal but is structured differently. The House proposal is expected to bring in $2 billion per year, beginning in fiscal year 2027 and would be dedicated to the Education Legacy Trust Account.
2. Property Tax Growth Increase. Focused on increasing funding for public safety and public education, this proposal would allow an increase in annual property tax growth from the current 1% cap to the combined rate of population growth plus inflation, not to exceed 3%.
3. Business and Occupations Tax Surcharge. This proposal would impose a 1% Business & Occupation (B&O) tax surcharge on businesses with taxable income over $250 million. The bill also includes an increase to the surcharge on specified financial institutions (approximately 200) with annual net income of $1 billion or more from 1.2% to 1.9%. Under this proposal, Washington would generate nearly $600 million in fiscal year 2026 and nearly $2 billion in fiscal year 2027.

What’s Next for the Budget and Revenue Bills?

The Senate Ways and Means and House Appropriations Committees held public hearings at the same time on their budget proposals, 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 25. Advocates had 60 seconds to provide quick feedback on what was – and what was not – included in the budget proposals.

Both fiscal committees are expected to vote out their budget proposals Thursday night. Lobbyists have been buzzing about whether amendments will be accepted prior to the committee votes. As of this writing, proposed Senate amendments are posted and most of the amendments proposed by Democrats are technical. We will see how many are adopted. Of course, those amendments that cost money will add to the budget challenges.

The Senate is expected to work this Saturday, March 29, to approve their budget. Again, there is the question of whether they will take amendments. The House is expected to take up its budget on Monday, March 31.

Week 12 will kick off with the Senate Ways and Means Committee holding a public hearing on the primary bills that are a part of their revenue package:

1. SB 5797 (Frame) – Enacting a tax on stocks, bonds, and other financial intangible assets with revenue dedicated to public schools.
2. SB 5796 (Saldaña) – Enacting an excise tax on large employers on the amount of payroll expenses above the social security wage threshold with revenue dedicated toward public schools, health care, and other programs that “protect the safety and wellbeing of the public and provide basic needs assistance for seniors and those with developmental disabilities.”
3. SB 5798 (Pedersen) – Concerning property tax growth limit increase with funding dedicated to public schools as well as cities and counties.
4. SB 5794 (Salomon) – Eliminating certain tax preferences, with funding dedicated to public schools, health care and social services.
5. SB 5795 (Krishnadasan)- Reducing the state sales and use tax rate.

This hearing is scheduled to start at 4:00 p.m. and I’m guessing the Senate Ways and Means Committee members may be in for a long night! As of this writing, the House revenue bills have not been scheduled for a hearing.

These revenue bills are key to budget negotiations because the ultimate revenue number is necessary to know the level of cuts/reductions needed to get to a balanced budget. Of course, budget writers and legislative leadership must ensure they have the votes to pass these revenue bills along with the budget – and also that the Governor will approve them. A lot of negotiation to come!

Bill Updates – Policy Committee Cutoff is Next Week

As a reminder, the policy committee cutoff for bills in the opposite chamber is coming up next week on April 2 and fiscal committees will have a few busy days of work before their April 8 cutoff deadline. Start Early Washington updates our bill tracker each Thursday with the latest information on bills we are following.

Early Learning Facilities Bill Off to Governor Ferguson!

On March 25, the Senate passed HB 1314 (Callan/Abbarno) on a 49-0 vote. Because this bill was not amended in the opposite chamber (the Senate), it does not have to return to the House for Concurrence and will be delivered to the Governor, hopefully for signature.

A priority of the Early Learning Facilities Coalition, HB 1314 seeks to make improvements to the Early Learning Facilities (ELF) Fund. Specifically, HB 1314 would:

• Make Tribal Compact Schools eligible for the ELF public school district program.
• Subject to appropriation, establish an Emergency Grant program for projects that are necessary because of natural disasters or another health or safety threat resulting from unforeseen circumstances.
• Clarify that projects supporting the conversation of ECEAP slots to full day and/or extended day are eligible for ELF Fund grants.
• Remove the level of matching funds as a criterion for selecting projects and make other clarifying changes to matching requirements.

What’s Next for this Bill?

According to Governor Ferguson’s webpage:

“Before the governor signs a bill, it must first be signed in open session in both the Senate and House. Once the house speaker and senate president sign the bill, it’s delivered to the governor’s office. This process can take several days following the passage of a bill by the Legislature.

Bills that are delivered to the governor more than five days before the Legislature adjourns have five days to be acted on. Bills that are delivered fewer than five days before the Legislature adjourns have 20 days to be acted on by the governor.”

It appears HB 1314 will be considered a “five-day” bill and we will report on developments.

Senate Bill to Delay Fair Start for Kids Act Heard in House Policy Committee

On Tuesday, March 25, the House Early Learning and Human Services Committee heard ESSB 5752 (C. Wilson) which would modify aspects of the Fair Start for Kids Act. As noted in the budget section above, the Senate budget proposal reflects savings associated with the statutory changes brought by this bill. Its updated Fiscal Note, showing cost savings of $1.1 billion, was also released on March 24. You can check out our February 28 and March 14 Notes from Olympia to get a recap of the bill’s components.

At the public hearing, early learning advocates registered their concerns with the numerous delays included in the legislation (public hearing on the bill starts at minute 31).

ESSB 5752 is scheduled for Executive Session on Friday, March 28.

Bills to Pause Transition to Kindergarten Continue to Move in Both Chambers

On Monday, March 24, the House Appropriations Committee heard PSHB 2012 (Bergquist) which would limit Transition to Kindergarten enrollment for each school district, charter public school, or state-tribal compact school to its 2024-25 school year enrollment, beginning in the 2025-26 school year. This approach is reflected in the House budget, leading to more than $70 million in biennial savings.

On Wednesday, March 26, the Senate passed another Transition to Kindergarten bill, SB 5769 (Wellman), on a 45-4 vote. Prior to passage, an amendment was adopted that limited funding to the amount included in the state budget, rather than tied to funding for a school year. This approach is also reflected in the Senate budget, creating more than $70 million in biennial savings.

Additionally, the Senate also adopted amendments that:

• Reestablish Transition to Kindergarten as a forecasted program.
• Direct OSPI and DCYF to develop a recommended plan for phasing in the TTK program. The plan must include a phased-in approach for expansion that does not exceed five percent growth in statewide annual average fulltime enrolled students each year.
• Require OSPI to submit a report by December 1, 2027, outlining the plan and recommendations for phasing in future TTK programs beginning with communities with the highest need.

Bill to Modify Child Care Provider Qualifications Receives Further Refining

On March 27, the Senate Early Learning and K-12 Education Committee took executive action on E2SHB 1648 (Dent) related to child care provider qualifications.

At the executive session, the Committee adopted a striking amendment that made the following changes to the bill. (Remember that a striking amendment removes the content of the underlying bill and replaces it with entirely new content).

• Provides that nothing prohibits DCYF from adopting rules that provide timelines beyond August 1, 2028, to allow providers additional time to meet staff qualification requirements based on their date of licensure, hire, or promotion, which can be no more than five years.
• Revises requirements for experience-based competency to include the following:
  (a) Requires DCYF to allow licensed child care providers until August 1, 2028, to demonstrate experience-based competency as an alternative to an early childhood education certificate;
  (b) Specifies that providers must have been employed without a break in service since August 1, 2021, as of the effective date of this section or a cumulative five years of employment and have completed and maintained compliance with all health and safety and child care or school-age care basics training for this option; and
  (c) Provides that nothing prohibits DCYF from establishing more restrictive requirements for providers serving the Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program.

An amendment to the striking amendment maintained the August 1, 2030 the deadline in the underlying bill to comply with child care licensing rules that require early childhood education initial or short certificates, complete the community-based training pathway, or demonstrate experience-based competency. (The striker had proposed moving the deadline up to August 1, 2028).

The bill now moves to the Senate Ways and Means Committee.

Budget Analysis

On March 24, the Senate and House released their respective proposed Operating Budgets, PSSB 5167 (Robinson) and PSHB 1198 (Ormsby).

We have included our initial comparison analysis of both budgets. A few notes:

• These are very complicated and complex budget documents, so it is likely we may have misread some details. Feel free to bring questions to our attention and we will include updates and corrections in an upcoming Notes from Olympia.
• The numbers presented include two years of funding for the 2025-27 biennium. If you would like further detail, please reach out.
• The base of the table is Maintenance Level funding, so any reductions are cost savings achieved from reductions from Maintenance Level and new investments are those above what was included in Maintenance Level.
• While funding for early learning and child care does include reductions, many of these are cost avoidance achieved through delayed implementation of upcoming milestones in the Fair Start for Kids Act. Pending legislation (ESSB 5752/HB 1489) would delay these Fair Start provisions.

Budget Highlights

The Senate’s $78.5 billion 2025-27 biennial budget is predicated upon $3 billion in cuts/reductions and $6.2 billion in new revenue in the upcoming biennium. The budget would tap $1.6 billion from the state’s Rainy Day Fund in State Fiscal Year 2026, with a pledge to pay the funds back in the following fiscal year. The budget includes plans to leave a $7.6 billion reserve at the end of state fiscal year 2029.

The Senate budget proposes state employee furloughs of 13 unpaid days for one year (the equivalent of a 5 percent pay cut). Their budget invests more than the House in education (particularly in special education) and does not include the $100 million in new funding for law enforcement that is a priority of Governor Ferguson.

The House’s $77.8 billion 2025-27 biennial budget would leave a total ending fund balance of $3.2 billion. Its budget is predicated upon $5.2 billion in new revenue. The House budget does include new funding for law enforcement and while it includes new funding for education, it includes less than the Senate. The House budget does not include salary reductions or require furlough days for state employees.

Quick Thoughts on Budget Approaches to Early Learning

• Areas of Alignment. The two bodies appear to be in alignment on the major cost drivers – delaying expanded eligibility for ECEAP and Working Connections Child Care; pausing additional Transition to Kindergarten enrollment while preserving current enrollment; and delaying by one year Working Connections Child Care rate increases to the 85th percentile of the 2024 Market Rate Survey (MRS).
• Senate invests more in ECEAP. By frontloading a 10% rate increase in year one, the Senate invests ~$10M more in ECEAP rates and invests substantially more dollars in ECEAP slots.
• Senate budget reflects ESSB 5752 approach. As expected, the Senate budget reflects the ESSB 5752 approach and includes more specific budget reductions, particularly in Working Connections Child Care “auxiliary” programs, than the House.

There is ample room for conversation and negotiation!

Check out Friday’s Notes from Olympia for a more thorough review of the budget approaches and The Washington State Standard coverage of the budget unveilings.

And a personal note of thanks to fiscal and agency staff and lobbying colleagues for helping build this document in a short timeframe. Any errors are mine.

A foggy start to week ten…

(Photo Courtesy: Erica Hallock)

Trivia!

Former Washington State Legislative House of Representatives Member Catherine May was the first woman elected to the United States Congress from Washington State. Which community did she represent?

Highlights of the Week

Updated Revenue Forecast Shows Declining Revenues

On Tuesday, March 18, the Washington state Economic and Revenue Forecast Council met to receive an updated revenue report from the state’s economist, Dave Reich.

Bottom line up front, the state’s revenues are projected to decline by $899M from the November forecast for the 2025-2029 biennia. They are proposed to be $479M lower for the 2025-27 biennium and $420M lower for the 2027-29 biennium.

On a more upbeat note, the forecast does show revenues for the current biennium, 2023-25, are expected to be $54M higher than what was projected in November.

Primary reasons for the reduced revenue projections include decreased sales and business and occupancy tax collections as well as overall elevated risks due to activity at the federal level. Specifically, Economist Reich mentioned federal tariffs policy as a particular risk to our state’s economy.

The next revenue forecast will be in June. Director Reich referenced several times that activity at the federal level (federal employee layoffs, tariffs, overall federal policy decisions) will likely impact that June forecast.

Senate Democrats Release Proposed Revenue Package

On Thursday, March 20, Senate Democrats released a proposed revenue package designed to offset deeper budget cuts. The proposed package includes:

1. Financial Intangibles Tax. Intended to raise roughly $4B a year beginning in fiscal year 2027 for public schools (with a focus on increased funding for special education), this proposal would levy a tax of $10 on every $1,000 of assessed value of certain financial assets held by individuals with more than $50M of these assets.
2. Removing the Cap on Payroll Taxes. This proposal would place a 5% tax on large employers on the amount of payroll expenses above the Social Security threshold and would be limited to companies with $7M or more in payroll expenses. Similar to Seattle’s “JumpStart” tax, it is expected to raise about $2.3B a year once fully implemented and would be dedicated toward public schools, health care, and other programs that “protect the safety and wellbeing of the public and provide basic needs assistance for seniors and those with developmental disabilities.”
3. Allowing Property Tax to Grow by Population and Inflation. This proposal would raise the property tax growth for the state’s common schools levy and for cities and counties as well as special purpose districts from the current 1% cap to the combined rate of population growth plus inflation. It would exempt participants in the “Property Tax Exemption for Senior Citizens and People with Disabilities” program from the state property tax. The state property tax is dedicated to public schools with about $779M in additional funding expected over the four-year budget cycle, with increased funding expected as well for cities and counties.
4. Repealing Ineffective and Obsolete Tax Preferences. This proposal would repeal 20 tax exemptions, generating just over $1B over the four-year budget cycle for public schools, health care and social services.
5. Cutting the Regressive Sales Tax. The final proposal would reduce Washington’s sales tax from 6.5% to 6%, resulting in a decrease of approximately $1.3 billion per year in revenue.

Joint Session to Memorialize Deceased Legislators

On Wednesday, March 19, the State Senate and House of Representatives held a joint session in the Senate Chambers to memorialize the 18 late Senate and House members who passed away over the past year.

(Photo Courtesy: Erica Hallock)

Family members of the departed legislators sat in the Senate gallery to witness the lovely and solemn event that included a flute performance by Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pedersen.

A rare look into the Senate Chamber via the Chamber doors which only open on special occasions

(Photo Courtesy: Erica Hallock)

Effort to Create More Specialty License Plates Stalls – Sorry Smokey!

In our February 28 edition of Notes from Olympia, I reported on an effort to create seven new specialty license plates, including one honoring Smokey the Bear. I’m sorry to report that legislation, HB 1368 (Orcutt), died in House Rules and will not advance this year. There’s always next time!

What’s on Deck for Next Week

Senate and House Budgets to be Released – Feedback Opportunity

Both the Senate and House will release their proposed 2025-27 operating budgets on Monday, March 24 with public hearings in the respective Senate Ways and Means and House Appropriations Committees the following day, March 25 at 4:00 p.m.

Public Input Opportunity. Both the Senate Ways and Means and House Appropriations Committees accept in-person, virtual as well as written testimony. If you would like to testify in-person or virtually, you must sign-up no later than 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 25. Written testimony will be accepted up until 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 26.

Follow these links to provide in-person, virtual, or written testimony:

• House Appropriations Committee
• Senate Ways and Means Committee (note that the Senate Ways and Means Committee accepts testimony by issue area)

Start Early Budget Summary. Start Early plans to produce a special edition of “Notes from Olympia” early next week with a summary of the Senate and House budget details. Be on the lookout!

Budget Executive Session Scheduled. Following Tuesday’s public hearings on the budget proposals, the Senate Ways and Means and House Appropriation Committees will hold Executive Sessions on these budget bills on Thursday, March 27 at 4:00 p.m. Given the budget situation, it will be interesting to see the number of amendments to the original budget proposals that are accepted. Following the executive session (vote) in the fiscal committees, the two bodies will vote on their budget proposals in their respective chambers and budget writers will work to negotiate a final budget compromise that can secure enough votes for passage (and approval by Governor Ferguson), all hopefully by Sine Die (adjournment) on April 27.

Policy Committee Work Continues in Advance of April 2 Cutoff

Policy committees continue their work reviewing bills from the opposite chambers in advance of the April 2 policy committee cutoff. Note that we are seeing a number of “Necessary to Implement the Budget” bills come into play, particularly those related to changing the statute to achieve budget savings.

For example, ESSB 5752 (Wilson) which would generate a number of savings for the budget by delaying aspects of the Fair Start for Kids Act and moving a number of early learning programs to “Subject to Appropriation,” is scheduled for a public hearing in the House Early Learning and Human Services Committee on March 25 and for executive session on March 28. (See our March 14 Notes from Olympia for details on the bill).

Additionally, HB 2012 (Bergquist) which would pause enrollment in the Transition to Kindergarten program to create budget savings is scheduled to be heard in the House Appropriations Committee on Monday, March 24.

I am keeping a close eye on the bill introduction lists of new bills, those proposing cuts as well as new revenue. Those bills, introduced this late in the session, still need to advance through all of the steps but it is a much smoother process when there is agreement among leadership in both chambers. As a reminder, each Thursday, Start Early Washington updates its bill tracker with the latest information on bills we are following.

In the field of home visiting, leadership isn’t just about steering a team; it’s about fostering a culture of empathy, growth, and inclusivity. A recent project led by Start Early, Leadership Pathways for Home Visitors of Color: An Exploration, sheds light on the successes and barriers that Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) home visitors face when striving for leadership opportunities. The project features the voices of two BIPOC home visitors who served as leaders on this work, Clare Willamson, Home Visitor/Parent Educator at Georgetown University Parenting Support Program, and Claudette Kabera, Family Case Manager at Community of Hope. Through the lens of their experiences, we explore what it truly means to be a leader in this field.

Effective Leadership to Empower BIPOC Home Visitors

Effective leadership in home visiting requires more than just managerial skills; it demands a profound understanding of the challenges faced by both families and team members. Clare emphasized the importance of empathy, transparency, and openness to feedback:

“It’s always great to feel like your supervisor is open to learning things from you because it creates trust on both ends.” – Clare Williamson

Having firsthand experience working with families allows leaders to establish a genuine connection and offer meaningful support to supervisees. Claudette highlighted the significance of shared experiences, advocating for leaders who have walked the same path as their team members:

“The best manager I ever had, was a home visitor before they became a manager. I always felt like they knew what we were going through and was our biggest champion.” – Claudette Kabera

It is crucial for leaders to be committed to continuous learning and growth, and to foster diversity within their leadership teams. By investing in the advancement of BIPOC home visitors into leadership roles, organizations can create pathways for greater representation and inclusivity.

“As a leader it’s important to know your community, and if you don’t know your community, be open to learning about it!” – Claudette Kabera

Transformation of Professional Identity

As leaders within the Leadership Pathways Project, Clare and Claudette found themselves in an environment where they felt valued and supported. This collaborative venture not only bolstered their confidence but also instilled a deep appreciation for the contributions of BIPOC home visitors.

“It was refreshing to have a whole team backing this project, and us, every step of the way. Sometimes, it felt like they saw our potential before we did. Being part of this project has made me more confident and made me appreciate BIPOC home visitors and all the work that they do.” – Claudette Kabera

Being part of such a transformative project not only enhanced their professional skills but also shaped their personal and professional identities. It fostered a sense of belonging and empowerment, affirmed their values as home visitors, and equipped them with insights into their potential as leaders.

“This was my first time being a part of a project like this. The consistent encouragement e.g. “you got this” or “you’re great” made me feel a sense of belonging, but also made me feel like they trusted me to do the work. And I think that’s huge!” – Clare Williamson

In essence, leadership in home visiting transcends traditional managerial roles. It’s about fostering a culture of understanding, support, and empowerment, where every team member feels valued and heard. Through their journey within the Leadership Pathways Project, Clare and Claudette exemplify the transformative power of leadership in nurturing a brighter future for BIPOC home visitors and the families they serve.

For BIPOC home visiting professionals aspiring to cultivate leadership abilities, Clare and Claudette offer practical advice. They stress the significance of self-belief, seeking mentorship, and expressing interest in leadership positions. By recognizing their own potential and actively pursuing opportunities for growth, individuals can embark on a journey towards leadership with confidence and determination.

To learn more about the Leadership Pathways project and the takeaways from this work, click here.

This blog post was co-authored by Clare Williamson (Home Visitor/Parent Educator, Georgetown University Parenting Support Program) and Claudette Kabera (Family Case Manager, Community of Hope).

Funding for early childhood education in Chicago is complex and ever-changing based on decisions made by lawmakers and agency leaders at the federal, state, and city levels. As the City prepares to engage in 2026 budget planning, the Illinois General Assembly prepares to approve Governor Pritzker’s proposed budget, and the new federal administration considers nationwide cuts to core early care and education programs, Chicago residents should take note of how these impending changes will impact some of the most crucial programs that serve Chicago’s youngest residents and their families. Here is an outlook on what’s to come: 

Federal Head Start and Early Head Start funding currently provides early care and education services to over 11,000 Chicagoans ages 0-5 in over 150 programs across the city. Any decisions made by the new federal administration or Congress on cuts to this Department of Health and Human Services-funded program could impact Chicago’s Early/Head Start programs, staff, and families. A loss or decrease in these funds could result in a greater need for state and city investment to sustain Chicago’s early childhood system.  

The state of Illinois’ Early Childhood Block Grant, which Chicago currently receives $284M of by state statute, is level-funded in the governor’s proposed budget, which means the largest source of funding for CPS pre-k and the Chicago Early Learning infrastructure remains the same and there will be no increases in funding for the upcoming RFP for community-based programs to apply for or re-apply for the 40% of these funds that are sub-granted by the City’s Department of Family and Support Services.  

And, while state budget increases to the Child Care Assistance program and Early Intervention will have the same limited impact on Chicago stakeholders as the rest of the state, the increase in funding for the Smart Start Workforce Grants will have an even more limited impact in Chicago, given the portion of Chicago’s young children who are served in programs that blend and braid public funds and therefore do not qualify for these grants.  

The City of Chicago’s Corporate Fund investment in early childhood education took a roughly $2M hit in the 2025 budget after being level-funded at $13M for several years. What this means remains to be seen, but this fund typically supports staffing at DFSS, in addition to key early childhood system infrastructure supports like the Chicago Early Learning Workforce Scholarship and Chicago Early Childhood Integrated Data System. This decrease in Corporate Fund dollars happened despite the child care workforce crisis gaining increased attention from members of City Council during the 2025 budget process.

The 2025 City budget also lacked sustainable funding for Family Connects Chicago, an essential program that ensures all families have access to the services they need following the birth of a child.  

This place has been keeping the lights on these past couple of weeks!

(Photo Courtesy: Erica Hallock)

Trivia!

Which recently retired legislator built and lived in a geodesic dome in a parking lot for several weeks as a college student?

Bonus question #1: What is a geodesic dome?

Bonus question #2: Why did this former legislator live in this dome?

Highlights of the Week

Floor Cutoff and the “5:00 Bills”

Wednesday March 12 at 5:00 p.m. was the official “House of Origin” cutoff. This cutoff served as the deadline for bills to be passed out of their House of Origin to continue to be viable this year. As I’ve mentioned previously, bills deemed “Necessary to Implement the Budget” (or “NTIB”) are not subject to these cutoff deadlines.

Often the Senate and House will schedule bills that involve lengthy debate as the so-called “5:00 bill” because as long as they begin work on a bill before 5:00 p.m. on the House of Origin deadline, they can work on the bill for as long as it takes. As the cutoff deadline gets closer, speculation among lobbyists who have spent the past ten days camped out on the third floor of the Legislative Building intensifies as to what the 5:00 bills will be in both chambers.

The strategy around the scheduling of 5:00 bills is deployed because, particularly as the week moves on, time becomes a precious commodity and there may not be enough time to get through all of the bills on the Floor calendar. This was especially true in the House of Representatives which worked well into the early morning hours over the weekend on highly controversial issues, debating bills and what felt like unending lists of amendments. In contrast, the Senate did not work this past weekend and wrapped up by 5:00 p.m. every day.

The Senate opted for its “5:00 bill” to be the bipartisan special education bill sponsored by the Majority and Minority leaders, E2SSB 5263 (Pedersen/Braun). This bill does have an early learning connection as it contains a provision to increase the funding “multiplier” for the Early Support for Infants and Toddlers (ESIT) program to align it with the higher multiplier for pre-K children. This increased multiplier would result in additional funding for ESIT programs.

This bipartisan bill passed unanimously and after thanking their staff for their efforts, the Senate adjourned at a respectable 5:15 p.m.

Over in the House, their “5:00 bill” was SHB 1296 (Stonier), otherwise known as the Parental Rights bill. In contrast to the Senate’s 5:00 bill, this bill was the opposite of bi-partisan and after roughly 2.5 hours of party caucus meetings, the body dove into debate on scores of amendments around 7:30 p.m. and finally adjourned around 2:20 a.m. after passing the measure.

Early Learning and Child Care Cost Savings Bill Passes Senate

In one of the final bills debated in the Senate before the House of Origin cutoff, the Senate passed ESSB 5752 (C. Wilson) which modifies various aspects of the state’s early learning and child care system to achieve more than an estimated $800 million in cost savings. Some of the key provisions include delaying ECEAP entitlement, pushing out income eligibility expansion for Working Connections Child Care and increasing family co-payments for Working Connections Child Care. For a summary of the underlying bill, see the February 28 Notes from Olympia.

Prior to the bill’s final passage, the body adopted a striking amendment as well as an amendment to the striker. As a reminder, a “striker” is a type of amendment that replaces the entire bill with a new version, effectively striking everything after the bill title.

The striker and the amendment to the striker kept most of the underlying bill’s provisions but made the following changes to the underlying bill:

1. Removes the repeal of the Early ECEAP program and instead makes the program subject to appropriation and enrollment dependent upon space availability.
2. Clarifies that the household co-payment for the Working Connections Child Care program for families with incomes above 60% of the State Median Income is $310 a month.
3. Makes the expanded definition of eligible child for ECEAP that is contained within the statute take effect July 1, 2025, instead of July 1, 2026.
4. Removes a child who is a member of an assistance unit that is eligible for or is receiving basic food benefits from the definition of eligible child for ECEAP.
5. Directs DCYF to adopt a rule that requires prospective payments to child care providers who accept Working Connections Child Care subsidies to occur when child care is expected to begin, and another rule that prohibits child care providers from claiming a prospective payment when a child has not attended at least one day within the authorization period in the previous month.
6. Removes language providing that a household’s 12-month authorization begins on the date that child care is expected to begin.
7. Directs DCYF to publish a cost of quality child care and market rate study and submit the study to the relevant committees of the Legislature by June 1st of every even-numbered year.

The bill passed the Senate on a 32-16-1 vote with three Republicans joining the Democrats to vote for passage. In brief remarks, Senator Chris Gildon noted he personally would vote in favor of the bill, but cited his caucus’ concern with the proposed co-payment increases as rationale for their opposition.

I encourage you to watch Senator Claire Wilson’s remarks on final passage of the bill (found at 26:50). She explains the challenge of our state’s budget situation led her to sponsor this bill and she reluctantly asked her fellow Senators for their support.

Early Learning Facilities Bills Both Still Moving

In a session where bills are dying left and right, it is unusual to have companion bills still alive at this stage in the process, but that is the case for the bills that seek to make improvements to the Early Learning Facilities Fund.

On March 10, the Senate unanimously approved SB 5297 (Trudeau/Torres) and that bill has been referred to the House Capital Budget Committee. It has not yet been scheduled for action in that committee. Its House companion, HB 1314 (Callan/Abbarno) was scheduled for Executive Session in the Senate Ways and Means Committee on March 13 (after our publication deadline).

You might be asking “did I miss the public hearing for HB 1314 in Senate Ways and Means?” Good question. You did not. Because the Senate Ways and Means Committee heard and passed the identical bill (SB 5297), the committee skipped the public hearing and scheduled HB 1314 straight to Executive Session.

To read more about the details of SB 5297, check out this one-pager on Start Early Washington’s policy resources page.

Policy Committee Action Resumes Policy Committee Action Resumes

The legislative calendar has a flow and, like clockwork, immediately following the House of Origin cutoff, the work transferred from the Legislative Building back to committee hearing rooms first thing on Thursday morning at 8:00 a.m. Thankfully for House members still recovering from their late night, their committee meetings were not scheduled to start until 10:30 a.m. Coffee, please!

The Senate Early Learning & K-12 Education Committee heard one early learning related bill at its March 13 morning committee meeting, E2SHB 1648 (Dent) related to child care provider qualifications. An amendment adopted on the House Floor, to E2SHB 1648 changed the deadline for when current child care providers must complete educational requirements, complete community-based pathway trainings, or demonstrate experience-based competency to August 1, 2030. The underlying bill included a deadline of August 1, 2032 and current law has an August 1, 2026 deadline.

What’s on Deck for Next Week

Ahoy – Seafood Day Awaits!

If you happen to be on the Capitol campus on March 20, be sure to check out seafood day. Pro tip: don’t get so excited about the free seafood that you cut in front of a really friendly State Senator who is just looking for a shrimp cocktail after a long day of budget negotiations.

Revenue Forecast Release

On March 18 at 2:00 p.m., all eyes in Olympia will be on the Washington State Economic and Revenue Forecast Council meeting where the State Economist will provide an updated revenue forecast. This forecast will inform budget writers about our state’s revenue outlook – are expected revenues higher than projected, or lower? How is the uncertainty around the federal government’s actions impacting this forecast?

Conventional wisdom is that the target for the Senate and House of Representatives to release their respective budget proposals will be early in the week of March 24. As of this writing it is unclear if one or both budgets will include a mix of proposed revenue/cuts or will be all-cuts to meet the proposed budget gap.

Following the release of the Senate and House budget proposals, legislative budget writers will work together – and with Governor Ferguson – to arrive at a final budget that will both balance and secure sufficient votes for passage. Whether this can be achieved before the scheduled adjournment date of April 27 is yet to be seen.

Continued Policy Committee Work – Next Cutoff is April 2

While budget writers focus on finalizing the budget details, policy committees will continue to work through policy bills in advance of the next cutoff on April 2. With fewer bills in play, the volume will be less than it was the first go-around. As of this writing, only one early learning bill is scheduled for a hearing next week. On March 19, the Senate Early Learning & K-12 Committee will hear SHB 1351 (Bernbaum) related to adjusting the age requirements for the Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program (ECEAP). I do expect more bills to get scheduled as the days progress.

The Half-Way Point of the Legislative Session

(Photo Courtesy: Erica Hallock)

Trivia!

Which current State Senator’s relative served in the House of Representatives in the early 1900s?

Highlights of the Week

State Budget Updates

On February 27, Governor Ferguson released a total of $4 billion in proposed reductions to state spending to help address the state’s estimated $15 billion four-year budget gap. The Governor proposed $254.8 million in savings for the Department of Children, Youth and Families (DCYF).

The Governor’s recommended reductions were informed by state agency proposals that were posted on the Office of Financial Management website on February 28. It is important to note that Governor Ferguson did not include all of the state agency proposals in his final recommendations list. He estimated the totality of state agency proposals he did not advance to equal about $1 billion.

DCYF’s recommended reductions total $248.8 million. Again, it is important to remember that Governor Ferguson did not accept and advance all of these recommendations and, as part of the Executive Branch, DCYF must align its position with that of the Governor’s.

In terms of what’s next for the state budget, the updated revenue forecast will be released on March 18 and the Senate and House budget proposals will be shared shortly thereafter.

Action Shifts to the Legislative Building

While week seven activity was in the fiscal committees, week eight was concentrated on the third floor of the Legislative Building, where the Senate and House of Representatives were either on the Floor debating on or voting on bills, or in their respective caucuses being briefed on or discussing bills that would be up for debate.

A lot of bills died in fiscal committees due to the state’s fiscal realities, which may have contributed to the intensity that built throughout the week as legislators and lobbyists were eager to get their remaining bills passed by the March 12 House of Origin cutoff. The fiscal realities continue to become clearer and bills with what would be considered a minimal fiscal impact in more typical years are not advancing.

Updates on Specific Legislation

Each Thursday, Start Early Washington updates its bill tracker with the latest information on bills we are following. As we reach each cutoff, we transfer the bills that are not “moving” into a separate chart below to make the active bills easier to identify. Please note that some bills in the “dead” or “not moving” category may end up becoming “Necessary to Implement the Budget” (NTIB) as deemed by legislative leadership. This work is an art, not a science and no bill or idea is truly dead until the final gavel goes down on Sine Die on April 27.

Early Learning Facilities Bills Moving

Late in the evening on March 5, the House passed HB 1314 (Callan and Abbarno) on a 97-0 vote. The bill sponsors Representatives Callan and Abbarno spoke to the bill’s aims to continue to refine and improve the Early Learning Facilities Fund so that it can continue to support capital investments for providers.

Earlier that day, Senate Rules Committee Member Senator Claire Wilson “pulled” HB 1314’s companion SB 5297 (Trudeau) so the Senate bill is now eligible for consideration on the Senate Floor.

Start Early Washington’s Policy Resources webpage has additional information on these bills – and other early learning policy related items. Check it out!

Early Learning Bills Stall in Fiscal Committees

As noted above, close scrutiny was given to bills with any level of fiscal impact. Fiscal notes that in typical years wouldn’t get a second look are generating amendments that reduce the fiscal impact.

As a result, many bills scheduled for consideration during fiscal cutoff week did not survive. In the early learning world, this included SB 5130 (C. Wilson) which would have eliminated child care licensing fees and SSB 5062 (Stanford) which would have established a Child Care Workforce Standards Board.

What’s on Deck for Next Week

Floor Cutoff and Back to Policy Committee Work

Immediately following the March 12 House of Origin cutoff, legislative work will transition back to policy committees hearing bills that passed out of the opposite chamber first thing Thursday morning, March 13. So far, no bills of note have been scheduled for policy committee activity next week. But we expect that to change as more bills pass out of their House of Origin.