As the Biden administration settles into the work of supporting states and communities to recover economically and socially, it is important to consider the lessons we have learned from this devastating moment in history.

This ongoing pandemic will influence so much of how we live and work for years to come, and we should seize the opportunity to reshape the pre-K to grade 12 accountability system.
The system’s focus should be less about singularly holding schools accountable and more on improving the quality of instructional practice and the organizational culture of schools. Federal and state leaders should consider changing how accountability systems are designed and implemented, and most importantly, defining the primary purpose of collecting and reporting data.

Changes in Collecting & Reporting Data

Today, state school superintendents have significant concerns about the testing and accountability requirements of the Every Student Succeeds Act. As of January/February 2021, millions of children have not entered a classroom for 10 months, and their total time out of school will continue to increase over the course of this winter. Given the current circumstances, the process for how states collect and report data used to measure school performance and child outcomes must include some flexibility from the federal government.

We also have should review the spectrum of data being collected to ensure that it best reflects what students need to be successful, what conditions best support their learning, and what support and guidance teachers need to create productive learning experiences.

Changes to Accountability Systems

The new administration also has an opportunity to develop a more inclusive approach to school performance measures. Improving the accountability system for teachers would help ensure that local educators are involved in the design and implementation of those systems, and that they receive the support and guidance needed to be successful in rising to meet outcome measures. For students, this is a chance to ensure that assessment tools are used to better address the unique challenges faced by specific groups of children, such as English Language Learners, children with special needs and children experiencing trauma.

Referred to as reciprocal accountability, this approach confirms that accountability systems are adaptive, iterative and focused on a culture of continuous improvement for schools and the administrations charged with holding those schools accountable. Recognizing that improvement is not a linear process and is a unique event for every school, responsibility is distributed across the education system’s stakeholders. In addition, data is used to help teachers improve their practice and identify the supports necessary to truly foster an organizational culture that is grounded in continuous improvement.

In closing, far too often, system leaders embrace and push to scale evidence-based practices that are proven impactful in ideal conditions but that fail when implemented in other settings. Ideal conditions cannot and sometimes should not be replicated in every setting. The tendency is to assume the concept is complete as it was originally conceived, rather than seeing it as something that needs to constantly evolve and adapt based on how humans use it in context of their cultural and geographic context.

Successful school refinement requires a sustained commitment to incremental, ongoing improvements that involve all stakeholders – parents, teachers, administrators and children. With these recommendations for the education system, we have an opportunity to make significant and long-lasting advancements for state education departments and school districts.

Trivia’s Back!

With the focus at the U.S. Capitol this week, I became curious about federal connections to our Washington State Legislature. As a result of my late night Internet searches, we have a two-prong trivia question this week:

  1. The Washington State Congressional delegation is comprised of two U.S. Senators and 10 members of the U.S. House of Representatives. How many members of our Washington State Congressional delegation previously served in the Washington State Legislature?
  2. Of those current members of our delegation who served in our Legislature, who was the most recent member to serve in our state Legislature and who was first elected to our state Legislature?

Start Early Washington Resources

As an organization just celebrating its one-year anniversary, Start Early Washington is working to build out its website and while it is a work in progress, we wanted to flag some resources that may be helpful:

Highlights of the Week

Settling in to this virtual session. We are now on day 12 of a 105-day virtual legislative session and navigating this new system is already “old hat” to lawmakers, staff, lobbyists and citizens engaging in the legislative process alike. Well, kind of.

One of the biggest takeaways so far is the continued realization that this process is simply going to take longer.  Last week we discussed the logistics involved for pulling off virtual hearings and while the legislative staff is really doing a herculean job, hiccups are bound to happen in nearly every hearing and floor session.  For those who had growing their patience as a 2021 New Year’s resolution, there will be ample opportunity to build that muscle.

Revenue collections to exceed forecasts. On Thursday, the state’s Economic and Revenue Forecast Council released its January report.  The good news is that General-Fund State contributions for December 11, 2020 – January 10, 2021 are $260.7 million (or 14.9%) higher than forecasted.  Our state’s hot real estate market continues to help fuel these increases.  The next official revenue report will come out on March 17, 2021 and those numbers will influence the 2021-23 budget building process

Fiscal committees hold work sessions. With the focus largely on policy committees in the first few weeks of the legislative session, the Senate Ways and Means and House Appropriations Committees often use that time to educate their members on the budget process and do deep dives on specific issues.  On Monday, the House Appropriations Committee had a briefing on budget basics.  The state budgeting process is incredibly complex and opaque, but this powerpoint provides some insights into the overall process and the decision points facing legislators engaged in budget writing.

On Tuesday, the Senate Ways and Means Committee received a bipartisan report from the Washington State Senate Special Committee on Economic Recovery.  Chaired by Senators David Frockt and Shelly Short, the special committee was formed in May 2020 and was charged with evaluating the impact of the pandemic on our economy and developing recommendations on how to help workers and employers in our state’s recovery.  Child care was a key focus of the select committee’s review and recommendations.  The report calls for investments in Working Connections Child Care reimbursement rates support for providers to increase supply and additional capital investment in early learning facilities.  I understand Senators Frockt and Short will be on an upcoming episode of TVW’s “Inside Olympia” where they will discuss this report and the importance of child care in our state’s recovery.  I will include a link in next week’s Notes.

“Early Action Bill” to be announced. Either tonight or over the weekend, details are expected to be released about an “Early Action Bill” meant to respond to imminent needs resulting from the pandemic, funded by dollars received from the federal stimulus package passed at the end of 2020 and some state funding.  We expect this Early Action Bill to include funding to address issues like vaccine distribution, rental and food assistance and support for child care providers.  As the name suggests, once introduced, the idea is this proposal would move swiftly through the legislative process so dollars can get out and respond to needs.

Early Learning Updates

Fair Start Act heard in policy committees. The big early learning news of the week centered on public policy committee hearings on the Fair Start Act.  (Another reminder about the availability of Start Early Washington’s summary of the bill as introduced).

On Thursday, the House Children, Youth and Families Committee devoted its full hearing to this bill and even with that dedicated time, not everyone who signed up to testify was able to present. As you are sipping your coffee and reading this newsletter, the Senate Early Learning and K-12 Committee is likely holding its hearing on the bill. These bills are companion bills which means they are currently identical.

This year the policy committee timeline is a bit compressed to provide ample time for floor votes down the line. This means that all bills must be out of policy committees by February 15th and we are seeing bills moving at a quick clip. The House version of the Fair Start Act (HB 1213) is expected to be voted out of the House Children, Youth and Families Committee on Wednesday, January 27th. As of this writing, a vote date has not been set in the Senate. We will update next week on how that went and what amendments were adopted.

Additional early learning bills. The Fair Start Act would create a comprehensive early childhood system and there are a number of other bills in play this year, including:

  • HB 1278 by Representatives Dent and Eslick.  This bill is scheduled for public hearing in the House Children, Youth and Families on January 28th and would suspend certain professional development and higher education requirements until Sept. 30, 2025.
  • SB 5023 by Senator Claire Wilson was heard in Senate Early Learning and K-12 Committee on January 15th and aims to ensure that certain unemployment benefits do not render families ineligible for Working Connections Child Care.
  • Heard in the Senate Health Care Committee on January 18th, SB 5062 by Senator Karen Keiser would create health equity zones.  The social determinant of health focus of this legislation could weave in early childhood strategies.
  • Scheduled for hearing this morning in Senate Early Learning and K-12, SB 5136 by Senator Claire Wilson would waive licensing fees for child care providers.  This is intended as a provider support strategy.
  • Also scheduled in Senate Early Learning and K-12 this morning, SB 5151 is the Department of Children, Youth and Families licensing bill.  Sponsored by legislative early learning champion Claire Wilson, the bill includes a provision to move the outdoor preschool effort from pilot to a permanent option for families.
  • Finally, SB 5277 by Senator Shelly Short would continue the current suspension of Early Achievers through July 1, 2022.  It has not been scheduled for a hearing in the Senate Early Learning and K-12 Committee.

Trivia Answers

Answer 1:

A total of eight members of our 12-member Congressional delegation served in the Washington Legislature at some time. Both of our Senators served (Sens. Murray and Cantwell) as did the following U.S. Representatives: Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler, Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, Congressman Derek Kilmer, Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Congressman Dan Newhouse and Congressman Adam Smith.

And while Congresswoman Suzan DelBene did not serve in the Legislature, she was the Director of the Washington State Department of Revenue under former Governor Christine Gregoire. Further, Congressman Rick Larsen was once a lobbyist for the Washington State Dental Association. I can’t, of course, ignore our two other members of Congress, Congresswoman Kim Schrier is a physician who became politically active in health care policy and the newest member of our delegation, Congresswoman Marilyn Strickland was the Mayor of Tacoma where, I’m sure, she engaged in state-level advocacy.

Answer 2:

The member of our Congressional delegation to most recently serve in our Legislature is Congresswoman Jayapal who was elected to the U.S. Congress in 2016. She was serving in the Washington State Senate prior to her election to Congress.

Now if I were in an official trivia contest, I would have answered the second part of this question incorrectly. I would have definitively responded that the person elected earliest to our Legislature was Senator Patty Murray. The mom in tennis shoes. I would have been fully confident. And I would have been wrong.

In fact, Senator Murray’s colleague in the Senate, Senator Maria Cantwell, was elected to the Washington State House of Representatives in 1986 at the age of 28! (Senator Murray was elected to the State Senate in 1988). I did a little Internet searching for pictures of Senator Cantwell from her Washington State House days and could only find this thumbnail picture:


It’s a blurry picture, but the big hair does scream late 1980’s. In looking at her colleagues in the class of 1989, I stumbled upon some familiar faces, including our current Governor Jay Inslee who was representing Yakima in the House at that time. He, too, has a different hair look:


The class of 1989 also included former Governor Gary Locke. The only legislator in the class of 1989 that is in the Legislature today is now Senator Mike Padden of the Spokane Valley, but he did take a break from the Legislature for a period to serve as a judge.

The Illinois Policy Team at Start Early is pleased to release our annual Illinois Legislative Agenda, a snapshot of the budget requests and legislative priorities for which Start Early will be advocating during the Spring 2021 legislative session in the state.

With the new legislative session underway, our team is focused on moving forward funding requests and legislation that will support families and providers across Illinois as they begin to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on our early childhood system.

Our goals for the year include:

  • Secure additional state funding to protect and strengthen the state’s early childhood system, with a specific focus on investments in the state’s early care and education workforce
  • Expand the state’s Medicaid program to cover doula and evidence-based home visiting services
  • Maintain telehealth as an allowable service delivery model in the Early Intervention program beyond the current public health crisis
  • Pass legislation to create a statewide paid family and medical leave program

COVID-19 has accelerated issues in our early education system that have been overlooked for decades. There has never been a better—or more critical time—for a U.S. Secretary of Education to chart their own course and boldly lead on early childhood.

The good news, addressing early learning and care is one of the few bipartisan opportunities for the incoming Biden administration. Polling from last year shows that early childhood education has broad support among Republicans, Democrats and independents. COVID-19 has shown that early learning and care is not a “nice-to-have”—it’s essential for children, families and our economy.

That’s why we are optimistic about President Biden’s choice in Miguel Cardona for U.S. Secretary of Education. Cardona brings two decades of experience as a practitioner in K-12 and has shown a commitment to equity and early learning, having served as co-chairperson of the Connecticut Birth to Grade Three Leaders Council. Additionally, his personal story is inspiring and reflective of the lived experiences of many of our early learners.

Many of the funding increases at the Education Department (ED) promised by the president during his campaign could allow states to meaningfully increase access to high-quality inclusive early learning programs and services, and we look forward to working with the new administration.

The new Secretary has an opportunity to provide the leadership needed to revise and improve programs, policies and funding streams managed by ED that impact the children and families we serve, including:

Aligning and coordinating early childhood work across the federal government.

As COVID-19 has illuminated, children and families rely on a complex fabric of supports to function and thrive, weaving everything from access to health care and broadband internet together. Similarly, the programs, policies, and funding streams that serve children from birth through age 5 and their families sit in multiple departments across the federal government.

Strengthening early childhood programs and supports won’t be the work of the Education Department alone.

Secretary Cardona will need to reinstitute strong collaborations between the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and other federal child and family serving agencies to ensure a seamless and comprehensive early learning system for families.

Increasing funding for Title I and ensuring states prioritize investments in prenatal-to-age-5 early childhood education.

Under Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), our nation’s education law, school districts (LEAs) can use Title I funds towards quality early childhood education. However, many haven’t done so, largely due to a lack of understanding on how to use or access these funds.Secretary Cardona has an opportunity to prioritize use of Title 1 funds for early childhood by providing clearer expectations and incentives for this use.

For one, like our K-12 students, our youngest learners face steep learning losses as a result of being out of the classroom for the past year. Studies have found preschool participation fell by half in some places, and few families have remained consistently involved in remote opportunities. When programs offered at-home learning support, most children participated less than once a week. As Title I funds are directed to support learning losses throughout the education system, programs serving children from birth through age 5 should be included as well.

Finally, while the potential increases in funding for preschool for 3- and 4-year-olds that President Biden has called for are exciting, even greater investment must be prioritized for infants and toddlers (and prenatally), to build a comprehensive prenatal-to-age 5 early learning system. We hope Cardona will champion these investments, even if they might happen outside of ED.

Ensuring school districts and community-based programs are set up for success to leverage Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) funds to support our youngest learners with disabilities and developmental delays across a continuum of settings.

Despite programs and resources designed to support them, children with disabilities remain underserved by early care and learning programs. Cardona can ensure our youngest learners with disabilities and developmental delays have access to early care and learning programs that are designed and resourced to support them by fully funding the IDEA, permanently authorizing the Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities (Part C of IDEA), and significantly increasing funding to the McKinney-Vento Homeless Education Program.

Including the unique needs of the early learning workforce in decisions around higher education financing, educator compensation and public service loan forgiveness.

The early childhood workforce was facing a crisis even before the COVID-19 pandemic. For years early learning professionals have been systemically underpaid and undervalued, creating a minimally trained workforce vulnerable to high turnover even as demand has increased.

Take the average child care professional. Despite having attained a bachelor’s degree in early learning and care to acquire the specific knowledge and skills needed to provide quality learning and care to our youngest children, she makes on average just $25,000 a year. She works for a private, for-profit child care center, making current options for student loan forgiveness unavailable. As she begins her own family, the pay won’t justify the expenses to find child care for her own children.

There are many ways Secretary Cardona could support a well-trained and well-paid early childhood workforce, including making Pell grants available for those interested in degrees in early learning and care or opening up student loan forgiveness to any child care worker regardless of whether they work for a for-profit or nonprofit child care center.

The Week in Pictures

Given the events of the past week in the Washington State Capitol, I thought it would be illustrative of the current scene in Olympia to share some of the activity using pictures captured on cell phone cameras.

On Friday, January 8th, the newly elected and re-elected legislators were all sworn in virtually – with two sessions for the House of Representatives and one for the State Senate. Note that most of the legislators have adopted the official House of Representatives background. One learning from this week is that certain clothing colors can make the legislator’s bodies “disappear” and they can look like floating heads!
Hands Raised

The next series of pictures represent different parts of the Capitol campus. After threats of potential violence, Governor Inslee activated 750 National Guard to join Washington State Patrol to provide additional security. The focus of this added security was Monday, January 11th as many legislators needed to be at the Capitol in person to approve the rules that allow them to move to a virtual platform.

I do not think I speak for just myself in saying seeing fences and barricades around Washington’s Capitol campus evokes a multitude of feelings. Thankfully, protests were peaceful and there wasn’t any violence.

 

Both the Senate and House of Representatives chambers look significantly different. Plexiglass was added and everyone was masked and socially distanced. On Monday, when a large number of legislators were present, some members were placed in the galleries overlooking the floors and voting was done in blocks with people rotating in and out of the chamber to vote. It was clear that setting all of this up took a tremendous amount of logistical coordination for just one day of action.

Senate Floor

And They’re Off

It is fair to say that we have all run out of phrases for these times. Unprecedented, different, unusual. While nearly everything is different, the need for our Washington State Legislature to work to serve the residents of Washington state has not changed. How they go about doing that looks very different, but the purpose has not changed.

After meeting in person on Monday to adopt rules, virtual committee hearings started bright and early Tuesday morning via Zoom. Were there glitches? You bet! Most significantly, a major windstorm on Wednesday rendered many legislators and testifiers without power. I will say that people have been very flexible and gracious – maybe living through a pandemic has softened us all.

The new process of virtual hearings and virtual testimony is new to everybody. Back to my point earlier about major logistical coordination, this virtual testimony is a huge investment of legislative staff time. Each committee has staff dedicated to getting testifiers in and out of the virtual waiting room. I particularly felt for the staff of the Ways and Means Committee who had 158 people sign up to testify – all managed with a smile. Despite spending the past ten months on Zoom, I can say from personal experience that virtual testimony was a bit confusing, and I am hoping it will be a breeze from here on out (pro tip learned the hard way – you have to turn on your camera manually when you are admitted to the hearing).

During the introductory hearing of the House Appropriations Committee and prior to Thursday’s lengthy budget review hearing, Chair Representative Timm Ormsby reminded his committee members that testifying can be intimidating and this virtual setting will allow for greater public participation. He shared that in his committee, he encourages “grace, patience and respect, by all to all”.

Speaking of public participation, the process to either sign in to testify or submit written testimony is explained quite well on the legislative webpage. This is a great time to share your thoughts.

The main activity this week for early learning was in the fiscal committees – the Senate Ways and Means Committee met on Tuesday and the House Appropriations Committee on Thursday – with a review and testimony on the Governor’s proposed budget. The Governor’s Director of the Office of Financial Management David Schumacher kicked off the hearings with an overview of the proposed budget. Copies of Director Schumacher’s powerpoint can be found on the committee website.

This was followed by public testimony that lasted for hours with people sharing their recommendations on budget items ranging from K-12 education to behavioral health to natural resources. Early learning received attention, with testifiers focused on the Governor’s proposed investments in child care and home visiting.

Bills, Bills, Bills!

I saw a tweet this morning of a water main exploding to illustrate where we are right now with bill introductions. Although legislators were able to “pre-file” bills throughout the month of December, the clip of bill introductions picks up in the first days of the legislative session.

There was an attempt to moderate the number of bills introduced given the restrictions of a virtual session. Under bill advancement guidelines, legislators were asked to only to introduce bills if they were urgently needed in 2021 and to introduce no more than seven . Additionally, legislators were asked that bills meet four filters: 1) advance racial equity; 2) respond to the COVID crisis; 3) advance economic recovery; and/or 4) address climate change. We will see if these guidelines actually lead to fewer bills introduced.

A major theme we are seeing so far in introduced bills relates to the state’s COVID response and specifically on the extent of the Governor’s emergency powers. Like everything else in 2020 (and 2021 so far), the number of decisions before the Governor associated with pandemic response was unprecedented.

Our state does have structures in place to allow for the expenditure of funding received outside of the legislative budgeting process timeline (e.g. a state agency receiving a grant in September) or for exercising gubernatorial emergency powers. The magnitude and duration of the pandemic certainly raised some questions about whether these structures needed adjustment. We are seeing bills ranging from severely curtailing a Governor’s emergency powers to tweaks to reflect lessons learned in the past ten months.

What’s in the Cue for the Next Week?

With the expectation that floor sessions will take longer given that legislators will be on Zoom, the timeline for Policy Committees was shortened to allow for more Floor Session time. The “policy committee cutoff” is February 15, and bills must be heard and reported out of policy committees by then. We expect the policy committee hearing calendars to fill up, particularly in the next couple of weeks.

The Fair Start Act which would lay out a structure and plan for a comprehensive and equitable early childhood system has been introduced in both the House and the Senate (HB 1213 and SB 5237, respectively). Sponsored by Representatives Senn and Chopp and Senators Wilson and Dhingra, these bills are slated to be heard next week, with the House Children, Youth and Families scheduled to hear the bill on Thursday, January 21st and the Senate bill on Friday, January 22nd in the Senate Early Learning and K-12 Committee. Given the comprehensiveness of these bills and the expected interest level for testimony, I would expect these hearings to be dedicated largely to these bills.

Our team at Start Early Washington is still analyzing the bills (which are identical at this point – known in this process as companion bills). We will provide more analysis in future Notes from Olympia.

Start Early extends its deepest gratitude to the Illinois Legislative Black Caucus for leading efforts to pass a suite of bills that will support young children from historically marginalized and under-served populations.

Providing a bright and just future for all children is impossible without recognizing that families and communities across Illinois have been impacted and traumatized by generations of institutional racism and long-tolerated inequities. We applaud the leaders in Springfield who understand the challenges at hand and have worked for months to address systemic issues in education, the criminal justice system, and the economy.

The Illinois General Assembly (ILGA) approved several measures intended to strengthen our state’s early care and education system this week. We are proud to have contributed numerous proposals included in the historic legislation moved forward by the Black Caucus.

Once signed into law by Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, the legislative package will:

  • Extend Early Intervention (EI) services until the start of the next school year for eligible age 3 children with summer birthdays
  • Codify in state law the Illinois State Board of Education requirement to assess all kindergartners with a common readiness assessment
  • Establish the Infant/Early Childhood Mental Health Consultations Act to encourage the state to increase funding for (and the availability of) I/ECMHC services
  • Require behavioral health clinicians working with children under age 5 to use a developmentally-appropriate diagnostic assessment and billing system
  • Establish the Early Education Act, which encourages the Illinois Department of Human Services to reexamine its eligibility criteria for the EI program; develop a plan for the establishment of specialized teams; and establish a demonstration project to strengthen connections between neo-natal intensive care departments and the EI program
  • Establish the Early Childhood Workforce Act, aimed at developing and supporting a more diverse early care and education workforce through increased compensation and the reduction of barriers to credential and degree attainment
  • Establish the Equitable Early Childhood Education and Care Act, which urges the ILGA to support and monitor the work of the Illinois Commission on Equitable Early Childhood Education and Care Funding
  • Update the Child Care Assistance Program eligibility calculator to improve the application experience for families

Although a pair of bills to reduce racial disparities in health care advanced through both chambers, unfortunately, neither measure received final approval. We will continue our efforts in the upcoming legislative session to advance our proposal that would expand the state’s Medicaid program to cover evidence-based home visiting and doula services. We are anxious to continue working with the Pritzker administration and the General Assembly to make Illinois the best state in the nation for infants, toddlers and preschoolers.

The Start Early 2020 State Policy Update Report provides a snapshot of early childhood care and education budget and policy changes during the 2019-2020 state legislative sessions as of November 2020. Despite unprecedented circumstances, states made progress expanding access to and improving the quality of early learning programs and building more effective early childhood systems. Representatives from a total of 28 states and Washington, D.C. responded and are featured in the 2020 report.

As advocates, system leaders and policy makers prepare for 2021 legislative sessions, there are no shortages of reports, briefs and publications to pour over to inform the development of legislative agendas. Yet, this report offers a few features that we believe offer unique value to readers. Start Early’s 2020 State Policy Update Report:

  1. Captures the Learning Journey of Policy & Advocacy: The report explores not only what passed, but what is still pending and what failed to achieve passage. We believe we benefit as much from learning about and capturing what didn’t work, as we do from celebrating what did.
  2. Tells Stories from the Field: Only capturing quantitative progress can miss the nuance of progress and the importance of partnerships in this work. Each section of the report features stories of success from our partners – in their own words – that add powerful context to the data.
  3. Covers the Full Early Childhood System: The report offers information on the administrative, budgetary and legislative changes across the following topics: Early Care & Education, Early Intervention, Infant & Maternal Health, Mental & Behavioral Health, Family Resiliency, Home Visiting, Workforce & Higher Education, Revenue, Governance and Data.
  4. Acknowledges Complex Pandemic Impacts: This year’s survey asked respondents to categorize their responses based on whether they were adopted in response to the pandemic and what, if any, advocacy priorities were put on hold.
Watch the Webinar Recording

State Policy Update Report Launch Webinar & Panel

In this spirit of learning, storytelling and centering equity, we hosted a webinar and discussion where we dug into the top-line trends that emerged from the data and stories we collected and considered what they may mean for 2021. To dig deeper into the experiences of community and state advocates, Start Early’s webinar included a panel discussion with Mary Gaul (Executive Director, Northwest New Mexico First Born Program), Amy O’Leary (Director of Early Education for All, a campaign of Strategies for Children), and Bridget Tobey (Child Care & Development Subsidy Manager, Cherokee Nation). Thank you to our panelists for sharing their insights! Check out the conversation’s recording.

 

Note From the Author

I typically start this newsletter with fun trivia somehow tied to the Capitol and/or legislative activities. Given the insurrection and violence at both our nation’s and our own state’s Capitol campus this week, I have decided to forego this tradition. I hope it will return next week.

2021 Legislative Session Officially Starts Monday, January 11th

On Thursday, the Associated Press convened its annual legislative preview sessions, one with Governor Inslee and a second with legislative leadership from each of the “four corners” (Senate Democratic and Republican leadership and House Democratic and Republican leadership).

Legislators and legislative staff have been working for months to craft a plan to protect the health of the legislators and their employees in the midst of a pandemic. Wednesday’s events at the United States Capitol and at our own Governor’s Residence, a threat of physical violence toward a Capitol reporter captured on video, and a number of planned protests on the Capitol campus next Monday with the potential for rioting and violence, clearly demonstrated that plans for safety extend beyond the pandemic to include protecting the physical safety of those on the Capitol campus engaged in the business of the State of Washington. The mood of these preview sessions was somber and a good portion of both sessions with the Governor and the legislative leadership were geared toward this question of safety.

While both the Senate and House of Representatives have plans to conduct most of their business virtually due to the pandemic, all 147 legislators will be on the Capitol campus on Monday, January 11th for the primary purpose of adopting rules that will allow for this virtual approach.

In normal times, the first day of legislative session would also include the official swearing in of newly elected legislators. Of course, these times are not normal, and both the Senate and House are planning virtual swearing in ceremonies on Friday, January 8th – with the Senate swearing in its new members at 1:00 p.m. and the House holding two swearing ins, one at noon and another at 4:00 p.m. Like all legislative activity, this will be covered on TVW.

This week has taught us that events that have been traditionally ceremonial in nature (like the adoption of rules and celebratory swearing in ceremonies) are actually critical to the continuation of our government operations.

Policy Committee Activity Begins

Following the Monday in-person Capitol activity, most legislators will return to their districts and will either conduct legislative business in their own homes or in their legislative offices. A very small number of legislative leaders and key staff will be present in the Capitol building throughout session and a limited number of legislators without dependable broadband will be allowed to work from their legislative offices.

Starting on Tuesday, the work of policy committees begins. The first couple of weeks generally involve an orientation to committee issues as legislation continues to be introduced.

Next week, for example, the newly constituted House Children, Youth and Families Committee (formerly the House Human Services and Early Learning Committee) will hold a work session on January 13th with an overview by the Department of Children, Youth and Families on their book of business. The Senate Ways and Means and House Appropriations Committees will both get overviews next week of the Governor’s proposed budget and will dedicate a public hearing to getting response to the Governor’s budget. I will note these are typically some of the longest in-person hearings of session. I am predicting they will be even longer as testimony will be virtual, allowing for more participation.

The legislature’s official website holds a lot of information, including copies of presentation documents from the hearings. The website will be updated likely on Monday to reflect the official 2021 structure and contact information for the new legislators.

Testifying in a Virtual Session

Earlier this week I served on a panel with other lobbyists about our projections for this unusual session. I am not alone in feeling anxious about navigating this new system. We all agreed that one winner with a virtual session will hopefully be people interested in weighing in on policy or budget items they care about. The previous system certainly set up barriers for public participation in that people had to GET TO Olympia. This was not inexpensive and could be quite time consuming. I should note, of course, that not everyone will have access to this virtual system, but it does improve accessibility.

The logistics involved in setting up a virtual testifying process have been intensive (we all recall the “zoom bomb” fiascos early in the pandemic at school board meetings, etc.). And while there is wide acknowledgement that this system is imperfect, but it is an attempt.

Here are the rules for submitting written testimony or signing up to testify.

Some items of note:

  • Written testimony will be accepted up to 24 hours after the hearing.
  • If you want to testify, registration closes one hour before the hearing. Each person testifying will receive an individual zoom link (I’m sweating for the staff who will be managing this).
  • Not everyone who signs up to testify will be guaranteed time and people may be asked to limit their time.
  • The normal rules of decorum apply, including acknowledging the Committee Chair and stating your name and organization for the record.
  • Any “Zoom backgrounds” must be appropriate. The Chair has the right to terminate someone’s testimony at any time.

Early Action Relief Bill Expected

One of the first collective actions the Legislature is expected to take is adoption of an early action bill designed to provide relief in response to Covid-related impacts.

Potential investments floated by the Governor and legislative leaders at the Associated Press forum this week include specific supports for vaccine distribution, Covid testing and contact tracing; rental, food and utility assistance; child care support; and business assistance grants.

The Governor’s Office of Financial Management has an accounting of the state’s use of federal funds distributed for Covid response. This includes a breakdown of the more than $147 million directed to child care relief. Child care was the sixth largest expenditure, following economic support, local government distribution and medical costs.

Trivia Question

We have entered the “prefiling” period for bills. During the month leading up to legislative session, legislators can “prefile” their proposed bills for consideration during legislative session. As I am reviewing bills dealing with issues ranging from mandatory Covid vaccinations to limits on gubernatorial emergency powers, I was reminded there are a lot of state laws that have perhaps outlived their time. I found a website “Weird Facts” that contains some of the weirdest Washington state laws. Now I did not fact check these, so they could or could not be true. So, behave accordingly. Answers at the end…

Logistics

For those who do not care for change (like this author), the adjustments required for a state legislature to conduct its business largely virtually are significant. The leadership and staff of the Washington State Legislature have been working tirelessly to establish protocols that first protect public health and also allow for continuation of the people’s business in a transparent and inclusive manner.

Both the Senate and House of Representatives have released their protocols for the 2021 legislative session. Following are some highlights:

  • TVW (tvw.org) will cover all legislative activity.
  • On the first day of session (January 11th), the House of Representatives will gather at St. Martin’s University in Thurston County for a socially distanced swearing in and the adoption of rules. For the Senate, the first day will require an in-person quorum of at least 25 members to vote on changes to Senate Rules. This will also involve social distancing.
  • Note, that at all times, the Capitol facilities are closed to the public. Only limited, essential staff and specified legislators are permitted on campus. Do not think about sneaking in – they have cameras!
  • Both bodies will conduct all legislative committees virtually. Sign-ups for testimony will open 24 hours prior to the hearing. This will significantly increase the ability for people statewide to engage in legislative committee testimony.
  • For the House, during floor sessions (when votes on bills are taken), only the Presiding officer, minority leader and caucus leadership are allowed on the floor. The Senate is encouraging legislators and staff to work remotely, but is operating in a hybrid manner and will have some Senators in person for voting, ensuring they are socially distanced.
  • There is the expectation that floor actions will take significantly more time due to the largely virtual nature. As a result, the weekly schedules have shifted to add more time for floor session (the typical Friday afternoon commute time is now slated for caucus and floor session, for example).  Also, the “cut-off” schedules have been adjusted to shorten the timing for policy committee meetings to allow for more floor session time.
  • There is the expectation that floor actions will take significantly more time due to the largely virtual nature. As a result, the weekly schedules have shifted to add more time for floor session (the typical Friday afternoon commute time is now slated for caucus and floor session, for example).  Also, the “cut-off” schedules have been adjusted to shorten the timing for policy committee meetings to allow for more floor session time.

Governor Inslee Releases Proposed Budget

On December 17th, Governor Jay Inslee unveiled his proposed 2021-23, $57.6 billion budget. Not surprisingly, the budget focuses squarely on the state’s recovery from the Covid pandemic, with proposed investments in a number of areas such as business relief, public health, rental assistance and child care.

Governor Inslee led off the week with announcements around his commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion – highlighting proposed investments including those to support community-based organizations, investments in broadband and funding for the state’s new Equity Office.

The Governor proposes an “early action” pandemic relief package when the Legislature returns in January with a focus on addressing the urgent needs of struggling businesses and rental assistance. There is also movement in the capital budget, designed to create our state’s version of a stimulus package.

While much of the discussion throughout the spring and summer months was focused on the bleak fiscal outlook for the state, the budget picture is brightening, although still tenuous and uncertain. Since our state’s revenue did not dip as much as expected, federal stimulus dollars provided assistance and caseloads are down, generating some savings, the Governor’s budget does not contain significant cuts.

It is important to note the Governor’s budget is predicated upon passage of a mixture of new taxes and revenues (totaling $1.3 billion) as well as tapping into the rainy day fund and cash reserves. By including these new investments, it allows him to propose new expenditures that would not be possible without this new revenue. Among other proposals, the Governor proposes a new capital gains tax as well as a “covered lives assessment” on health insurers, Medicaid managed care organizations, limited health service contractors and third-party administrators.

With the release of the Governor’s budget, attention now turns to the Legislature where they will draft and ultimately pass a final budget for the Governor’s approval.

Proposed Early Learning Investments

*Caveat to the information below. Analyzing budgets is like peeling an onion. You always find things you missed or get clarification that can shift your analysis. So, please take this as my first read.

Governor Inslee recognized the significant impact of Covid on child care with a number of investments and development of a budget highlight document on the issues.

Proposed key investments include:

“Pandemic” Home Visiting ($5.6 million). One-time funding is provided to provide 530 families home visiting in 23 communities with high rates of child abuse and neglect investigations.

Child Care

  • PPE ($2.2 million). Support for child care providers to purchase PPE.
  • Health Care Coverage Sponsorship Pilot ($27 million). Create a four-year pilot for early learning providers in licensed child care centers to receive a $100/month reduction in the premium for Qualified Health Plans through the Health Benefits Exchange after the individual’s advance premium tax credit is applied. This pilot would impact about 10,000 workers.

Working Connections Child Care

  • Income Eligibility Increase ($23.9 million). Increase income eligibility by 10% from 200% of the federal poverty level to 210% to serve 4900 more children in Working Connections Child Care.
  • Working Connections Co-Payment Relief ($39.7 million). Temporary change the co-pay structure to reduce the co-payment by 50% for families between 144-200% of the federal poverty level. This would impact 8600 families.
  • Family Child Care Collective Bargaining Agreement ($6.4 million). The Collective Bargaining Agreement includes a 35 cent an hour increase for Family, Friends and Neighbors ($4.41 million); a two percent increase for Tiered Reimbursement for providers at Early Achievers 3.5 ($854,000); and a 17.6% increase for non-standard hours ($1.1 million).

ECEAP

  • ECEAP Slot Increase ($9.6 million). This funding would support 750 new slots in FY 2023, with 90% of the funding for full-day (6 hours) and 10% for extended-day (10 hours).
  • ECEAP Rate Increase ($9.7 million). Funding is provided for a 7% rate increase.
  • Facilities ($4.7 million in bonds). Capital funding is provided for facility construction and renovation grants to current and potential ECEAP providers.
  • ECEAP Entitlement ($41.466 in savings). In recognition that Covid impacted ECEAP enrollment, savings is assumed for not meeting the 2022-23 ECEAP entitlement.  This is funding that was included in the four-year budget with the assumption that more slots would be added.  Because these slots will not be included, it results in a savings.
  • ECEAP Entitlement and Integration ($1 million). Funding is provided to develop a roadmap to meet ECEAP entitlement, to identify capital investments to build classrooms and to workforce needs.  Additionally, DCYF and OSPI is provided funding to complete a report on efforts to align high-quality preschool in our state.

Early Learning Navigators ($3.9 million). Funding is provided for a new program designed to assist child welfare engaged families in 23 regions with high rates of child abuse and neglect investigations. These early learning navigators will assess need, match to available programs and help families enroll.

Additional Community Investments

During this challenging time, we are seeing a number of philanthropic and companies step up to assist Washingtonians during this pandemic. Today, Microsoft announced a $110 million investment for Covid-related economic and education recovery, that includes funding for local nonprofits and assistance in re-opening schools. Additionally, Washington-based Mackenzie Scott made a number of significant investments in Washington state nonprofits in the past days. (Editorial note – reading the responses of the surprised nonprofits who did not solicit these gifts is simply delightful). Finally, All In WA announced nearly $3 million in grants to child care providers, among other investments.

With our focus on state-level work, it is also important to acknowledge and recognize these corresponding investments contributing to our state’s recovery.

Trivia Answers

According to “Weird Facts,” it is illegal in Washington state to:

  • Walk about in public if he or she has the common cold.
  • Paint polka dots on the American flag.

Attach a vending machine to a utility pole without prior consent from the utility company. (Assuming this law came as a result of some prank?).
Locally, the following acts are illegal in these municipalities:

  • In the City of Wilbur, one may not ride an ugly horse.
  • In the City of Walla Walla, it is illegal to give noxious substances to a bird in any city park.
  • And in the City of Spokane, it is illegal to kneel on a pedestrian skywalk.

Given the filters imposed for 2021, it is highly unlikely any “weird” laws will be added to this list as a result of 2021.

The Illinois Policy Team at Start Early is proud to share our first-ever policy agenda! This new, three-year policy agenda represents Start Early’s policy priorities in Illinois through fiscal year 2023 and encompasses not only our advocacy efforts in Springfield, but the administrative policy and systems-building work we do with our public and private sector partners.

Our agenda demonstrates our commitment to ensuring that Illinois has an early childhood system that is designed, implemented and sustained in order to equitably provide a continuum of high-quality services to children from before birth through age 5.

To that end, we will be focused on five key priorities:

  1. Increasing investments in and strengthening the design and implementation of Illinois’ core early care and learning programs
  2. Strengthening the infrastructure of Illinois’ core early care and learning system
  3. Recruiting and retaining a representative, well-compensated and qualified workforce
  4. Improving the health, mental health and well-being of young children and their families
  5. Improving economic security for families with young children

Incorporated in this agenda are objectives that support the work of the Illinois Prenatal to Three Coalition, a collective effort to advance the Illinois Prenatal to Three (PN3) Policy Agenda. The comprehensive and multi-year PN3 Agenda was developed by a broad group of more than 100 diverse stakeholders with a goal to ensure that Illinois’ youngest children and their families, especially those furthest from opportunity, are on a trajectory for success. In partnership with the Governor’s Office of Early Childhood Development, we are thrilled to continue leading efforts to forward the work of the Coalition. We are eager and excited to roll up our sleeves alongside so many partners and get to work for Illinois infants and toddlers! Learn more.

In addition to our three-year policy agenda, each winter we will unveil our one-year legislative agenda, which features our top priorities for the state’s General Assembly. Stay tuned for our 2021 Legislative Agenda in January. Until then, we invite you to read our Start Early Illinois Policy Agenda for Fiscal Years 2021-2023. To stay in touch and learn about new publications or updates on our agenda, please sign up for Illinois policy email alerts and follow Start Early’s Illinois Policy Team on Twitter (@EarlyEdIL).