Research on early childhood education has demonstrated that children, families and staff thrive when organizations invest in teams. When we shift the focus out of the individual classroom and onto high-quality organizational conditions, we can help teams become stronger in the areas most critical for child outcomes and drive lasting system change. With that in mind, Start Early collaborated with the University of Chicago Consortium on School Research to create, pilot and test The Essential 0-5 Survey framework and surveys.

The Essential 0-5 Survey measurement system offers educators three powerful resources to understand the strength and quality of their organization and catalyze program improvement: teacher/staff and parent surveys, user-friendly reports and data, and a data-use and improvement toolkit.

Our research team tested and evaluated whether The Essential 0-5 Survey captures reliable and valid information about the organizational quality of early education programs. The results confirmed the reliability of the surveys across school- and center-based settings. Responses also aligned with survey scores on teacher-child interaction quality and attendance outcomes, confirming that the surveys provide valuable information for measuring organizational effectiveness.

Looking ahead to additional applications of The Essential 0-5 Survey, our team has adapted them for use in infant-toddler settings as well. To date, these birth-to-age 2 versions of the surveys have been piloted within Early Head Start-Child Care Partnership programs in Colorado, Florida and the District of Columbia. Our team is in the process of analyzing the pilot survey data for a validation study in 2020, before broader release in the field.

Key Findings

  • Reliability
    • All the measures on the surveys were reliable. Many measures were sensitive enough to detect differences between sites. The surveys did not have strong bias toward either school- or community-based early childhood education (ECE) sites; or English or Spanish speakers (on the parent survey).
  • Validity
    • Most, but not all, Essential scores were significantly related to site-level outcomes including teacher-child interactions and children’s attendance.
    • Neither Ambitious Instruction nor Parent Voice scores were significantly related to either outcome measured. Researchers will continue to refine the survey tool and parent survey.
  • “Practical” Validation
    • Interview and observation evidence confirmed that The Essential 0-5 Survey differentiates between ECE programs. Staff and families in sites with high and low survey responses provided qualitatively different descriptions and experiences of organizational climate and conditions.

Publications & Resources

Note: Research and reports published prior to 2020 refer to The Essential 0-5 Survey as the Early Education Essentials.

Research & Evaluation Team & Collaborators

Funders

  • Anonymous Funder
  • Crown Family Philanthropies
  • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  • The Joyce Foundation
  • W.K. Kellogg Foundation
  • Pritzker Children’s Initiative

Continuity of care — strategies designed to lengthen children’s ability to continuously participate in high-quality early learning experiences — must be a cornerstone or guiding principle for state or local early childhood policy agendas focused on improving outcomes for less-advantaged children and families. This paper provides a research summary, considerations for program and policy design, best practices, case studies and talking points that advocates can use to help policymakers and early childhood practitioners implement continuity-of-care policies and practices.

Key Findings

Whether required by regulation, defined by voluntary association standards, or inspired by concepts of best practice, programs can promote the continuity of care through structural design and professional development. This includes:

  • Using group size and ratio
  • Creating flexibility in classroom age ranges
  • Promoting teacher retention
  • Minimizing changes in teacher assignments
  • Attention to how teacher scheduling might impact relationships with children and families

State policy levers that influence the capacity of a program to provide continuity of care include:

  • Child care subsidy eligibility status
  • Provider payment rates and payment mechanisms
  • Licensing regulations on group size and ages
  • Professional development network focus and investments

Policy Team & Collaborators

The Illinois State Board of Education has released its next installation of Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS) data, providing a snapshot of the skills young children had as they entered kindergarten in fall 2019. This year’s KIDS data shows the positive impact our state’s quality early childhood programs are having to increase the number of children entering kindergarten ready to learn. As we work to rebuild our state’s early childhood system, we can use this report as a tool to continue to advocate for increased investments in early learning and care that are essential for addressing and diminishing the inequities in readiness that exist for our youngest learners.

“This year’s report will be an important watermark to measure success as we work to build Illinois’ early childhood system back better and more equitable in the months and years following the pandemic,” Diana Rauner, Start Early President and CEO, said. “The inequities we see in kindergarten readiness across the state have only been magnified by the pandemic, underscoring the long-standing need to invest more in our early learning support and infrastructure, especially in under-resourced communities.”

Beginning in the 2017-2018 school year, all kindergarten teachers in Illinois began observing their students on a common set of developmental measures using the Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS). KIDS provides kindergarten teachers with information to support classroom instruction, helps parents understand expectations for their children in kindergarten and gives lawmakers and school administrators data to help determine how resources should be directed to help all young children enter kindergarten with the skills and supports they need to succeed.

Read the joint statement

Read the full report

Investments in quality early childhood education services, from birth through age five, can be one of the most cost-effective strategies for school districts to fulfill their overall objective of ensuring that all children in their districts succeed in school and go on to success in college and careers. This guide provides key questions and principles to guide how school boards can be thoughtful in their design, implementation, and funding of early learning programs to ensure that they are effectively investing in programs that will contribute to the district’s long-term goals.

Key Findings

In order to support early learning, school boards should:

  • Assess the current status of early learning in the community
  • Articulate goals for early learning
  • Build on state systems
  • Focus on instructional quality and leadership
  • Instill family engagement practices
  • Respond to a growing population of bilingual children
  • Support comprehensive services

School districts should leverage their dual roles as providers of services and essential partners in early learning systems building to advance high-quality early care and learning.

Policy Team & Collaborators

The Challenge

Children with a strong start in math by age 5 are critical thinkers and problem solvers—and are more likely to have a bright future ahead of them. Research shows that early math is a strong predictor, even more than reading, of academic achievement in elementary school, high school graduation, and college enrollment.

Yet, math is rarely emphasized in early childhood, and low-income and communities of color, in particular, have limited access to early math learning opportunities.

PBS SoCal’s Compton Family Math Initiative aims to create quality resources and experiences that empower families to engage with their children in math early and often. The team at PBS SoCal engaged The Early Learning Lab (The Lab) to build their human-centered design capacity and ensure their family math curriculum and future initiatives would resonate with local families.

Early Learning Lab Human-Centered Design + training with PBS Socal
Early Learning Lab Human-Centered Design + training with PBS Socal

Our Approach

The Lab led a human-centered design (HCD) process that brought the PBS SoCal team together with parents from Compton, CA to design early math experiences for their family math curriculum. The Lab also incorporated strategies from behavioral economics, systems thinking, and regenerative innovation to design in uncertainty with equity.

Our methodology included:

  • Human-Centered Design Training: The Lab conducted a training for PBS SoCal on how to use HCD to create programs that meet the needs of families.
  • Design Sessions: We worked with PBS SoCal to craft experiential prototypes of math activities families can do with their children. Then, we tested these prototypes and gathered insights through two design sessions with a total of 25 parents of young children. During the sessions, PBS SoCal played a hands-on role to apply their new HCD skills.
  • Interviews: PBS SoCal led one-on-one discussions with eight parents to gain deeper insight into the attitudes, needs, and challenges families have related to early math.
  • Surveys: A week after the design sessions and interviews, seven parents completed a follow-up survey about what they have done and their views on supporting math at home since the design session, what they liked most, and what they would change.

The Results

Participants at Early Learning Lab Human-Centered Design + training with PBS SocalPBS SoCal gained actionable recommendations for designing the family math curriculum as well as guidance on how to use human-centered design to continuously refine programming and keep families at the core of the initiative.

Through our training and research, we delivered the following:

  • Capacity building in human-centered design including identifying and redefining challenges, prototyping, design sessions, listening to communities, and insight gathering
  • Prototype feedback to validate or refine math modeling exercises and media for parents and caregivers
  • Insights into parents’ attitudes, likes, routines, and challenges that will help inform the delivery of the family math curriculum
  • Family math ideas from The Lab’s child development perspective
  • Design principles and recommendations for implementation to prioritize in developing the family math curriculum
  • Tools and templates for holding future design sessions, tips for interviewing, and additional resources to learn more about HCD.

Participants at Early Learning Lab Human-Centered Design + training with PBS SocalThroughout our research, participating parents demonstrated that they are deeply interested in bringing new life to math for their children by bringing it into their lives. From here, PBS SoCal will leverage the insights from our partnership to develop their family math curriculum to meet the needs of local families.

It was a great opportunity for me and my team to learn new ways to solve community challenges and develop design principles to drive, strengthen, and raise families’ voices and perspectives.

Susie B. Grimm, director of early learning at PBS SoCal
corner square square circle corner pie circle square
Publications & Resources

Designing Family Math

This report includes our findings, design principles, recommendations and tips from The Lab’s child development perspective, and guidelines for interviewing parents and running design sessions in the future.

Note: Reports were published prior to the Start Early and The Early Learning Lab merger.

In this blog post, Start Early vice president of translational research, Debra Pacchiano, highlights her recently published research on the importance of providing strong and nurturing leadership to early childhood teachers in order to improve child outcomes.

Recent early childhood research has confirmed that— if we want teachers to nourish children, we must first nourish teachers.

When a child begins their life-long learning journey, parents and families expect they will be cared for and taught in safe, positive, and effective environments. Unfortunately, that’s not always the case. The quality of early learning programs varies tremendously with the highest quality programs disproportionately serving children from the most advantaged homes. By contrast, lower quality and less effective programs disproportionately serve children from under-resourced communities—the very children who stand to benefit most from top-notch early childhood education (Valentino 2017).

Teaching is complex work. In early childhood, teachers work with young children, often from vulnerable populations, who are in critical developmental stages. Variations in children’s early learning outcomes are often attributed to under-engaged teachers and low-quality teaching. Yet, all too often teachers face their complex work without needed sustained supports from leadership and their peers.

Start Early has worked at the intersection of research, practice, and policy for more than three decades, spearheading innovation and quality improvement in early childhood education. We activate creativity to design solutions rooted in research and applied science to address chronic issues in the field.

As part of this work, we spent time observing early childhood education programs, some that were high functioning and some that were not. We talked with leaders, teachers, staff, and families about what supports and what hinders their effectiveness advancing young children’s learning. Differences in their organizational mindsets and practices were unmistakable. Simply put, high-performing programs had organizational environments far more supportive of teaching, learning, and family engagement than lower-performing programs. In response, we built The Essential 0-5 Survey (formerly known as the Early Education Essentials), an organizationwide measurement system that elevates the voices of teachers, staff, and families in early childhood settings and empowers collective action towards improvement.

A recent Education Week study found substantial gaps between the perceived and real impacts of leadership on teachers. By highlighting teacher and staff perspectives on organizational strengths and weaknesses in key areas of climate and culture, The Essential 0-5 Survey can help close those gaps between the impacts leaders believe they have, and the impacts teachers and staff actually feel.

In a Young Children journal article, published by myself and other Start Early researchers, we highlight the positive impacts The Early Education Essentials can have on early childhood environments and teachers’ experiences. The article features the clear differences that were identified, through The Early Education Essentials, between organizations strong in the areas of effective instructional leaders, collaborative teachers, involved families, supportive environment, and ambitious instruction, and those that were weak in those areas. Listen to what one teacher in a strongly organized program had to say about her organizational culture:

I feel like it’s empowering [here]—it’s not just from the top down. It’s right here, and we believe in this stuff and I have something to share and it’s valued by our administrator. Then your co-teachers and your colleagues also buy in too, and you have that energy and you have that love. Then you have an administrator that pushes you in that way and supports you and guides you and nudges you a bit farther. I think it’s kind of what we try to do with our students too, now, even when they’re only 3. I think [the principal/ director] leads by example, for sure.

Strong organizational environments in early childhood education empower leaders, teachers and families to aspire to and realize higher-quality practices and better outcomes for young children.

The Start Early national policy team provides policy consultation and advocacy expertise to early education leaders and advocates across the country. We work to improve and expand the policies and programs that create quality early learning programs and effective early childhood systems.

Our 2019 State Policy Update provides a snapshot of states’ early childhood education policy priorities and budgetary changes during the 2019 legislative sessions.

Included in the report:

  • Legislative, budgetary, and administrative changes across 33 states organized by topic to demonstrate the breadth of the work done by state early childhood leaders and advocates.
  • Data that illustrates trends across state-level early childhood policy changes, how states are thinking about priority populations, and how state advocates are involved in federal-level policy advocacy.
  • Stories from state advocates that give voices and faces to the policy wins and demonstrate the direct impact of their work.

The Illinois Policy Team works closely with partners and legislators to help shape the foundational elements of the state’s early childhood system, including major funding streams, legislation and federal and state initiatives. With a long history of work that is rooted in our deep experiences in Illinois, the team diligently advocates for high-quality early childhood services that children and families need beginning prenatally and through the first five years.

Over the last year, through legislative, administrative and grassroots advocacy, we successfully championed a number of noteworthy bills to became law that are significant to young children, parents, teachers and other early childhood practitioners. Perhaps most notably, the Illinois General Assembly passed the state’s fiscal year 2020 budget with significant funding for the state’s early childhood system.

This account of Illinois’ work from the 1980s to the early 2000s to raise young children to the top of its policy agenda offers insight to other states as they continue to push for public policies that respond to accumulated research findings about the importance of the early years. This publication shares what policymakers, advocates, and funders in other states might learn from Illinois’ approach and a breakdown of which strategies hinged on conditions unique to the state, and which hold promise for success elsewhere.

Key Findings

Lessons learned from Illinois’ decades of early childhood advocacy include:

  • Build from core beliefs, not blueprints. The key advocacy organizations that contributed to advances in early childhood policies and programs have shifted focus on strategies, constituencies, and policies, but they have never lost sight of the core beliefs and commitments that unite them.
  • Build leadership. The Illinois story was made possible by bold moves and behind-the-scenes leadership by elected officials, community leaders, advocates, and philanthropists.
  • Focus on building inclusive, diverse relationships with a variety of early childhood stakeholders, including communities, elected officials, agency staff, early childhood professionals, and the media.
  • Take a marathon approach. Illinois early childhood advocates made a commitment to work with others toward shaping and implementing, over years and even decades, policies and programs aligned with their core commitments. They have taken a marathon approach to early childhood policy, recognizing the incremental nature of progress and the sustained support required to achieve it.

Policy Team & Collaborators

This publication provides an overview of Preschool for All and the Illinois Early Learning Council’s recommended next steps for funding and implementing it in Illinois. In 2006, our state had made significant advancements in its early learning system. Implementing a Preschool for All program could help ensure that the excellence that is available to some young children is available to all of our preschoolers and families.

Key Findings

In order to implement a Preschool for All program, this publication recommended Illinois:

  • Build capacity to implement Preschool for All over multiple years, prioritizing high qualifications for staff, particularly lead teachers and program directors; improving staff preparation; and providing excellent ongoing professional development.
  • Examine funding sources: Preschool for All monies would supplement, not replace, existing early childhood education funding streams, and would support infrastructure that promotes quality.
  • Forge a coordinated, integrated early learning system that families can understand and easily access.
  • Encourage and support community collaborations that foster partnerships and enhance service coordination at the local level between schools, early care and education providers, child care resource and referral agencies, colleges and universities, businesses, government, service groups, and parents.

Policy Team & Collaborators