In this blog post, Educare Learning Network member Drew Giles provides his perspective on how early care and learning administrators can support staff resiliency during rebuilding and recovery.

In spring 2020, Start Early partnered with the Educare Practice Advisory Committee, a broad group of Educare Learning Network members, to share our experiences and join in a conversation that is underway about the future of early childhood systems and supports in the United States. Through the Build It Back Better conversation, several consistent themes appeared, such as concerns about new ways to engage families, the increasing exposure of the digital divide and identifying equitable ways to address this major issue, and the need to prioritize self-care and wellness, not only for children and families, but also staff.

As a Northern California-based school director at Educare California at Silicon Valley, as well as a registered yoga teacher, I am constantly looking for ways to incorporate self-care strategies that support our organization’s climate and culture. The COVID-19 pandemic has shined a light on the lack of funding and positive treatment of early childhood educators, a fact that many of us already knew. While waiting for policymakers to address these issues, one small but impactful thing that I can do for the staff at my school is provide them with opportunities to practice self-care.

On flights, we’ve been trained that in the event of an emergency, be sure to secure your own mask before assisting others. The same is true for us as educators and human beings. We are often asked to do so much with fewer resources and time. In order for us to do this challenging — yet rewarding beyond compare — work, we must prioritize self-care into our program’s culture.

What is self-care, you might ask? According to PsychCentral, “self-care is any activity that we do deliberately in order to take care of our mental, emotional and physical health. Although it’s a simple concept in theory, it’s something we very often overlook. Good self-care is key to improved mood and reduced anxiety. It’s also key to a good relationship with oneself and others.”

In this blog post, I will share five free things that all administrators can do to ensure that we rebuild and recover in resilient ways.

1. Begin meetings with breathing exercises

Whether you’re having an informal check-in with a colleague or a formal meeting with your program’s staff, begin each meeting by bringing attention to your breath. You can do this by coming to a comfortable seat, gently closing your eyes or finding a soft gaze in front of you, and taking three collective breaths as a group. This helps to calm and reset the mind and bring awareness to the present moment.

2. Encourage mindfulness breaks throughout the day

Taking mindfulness breaks throughout the day is a great way to recharge your energy, improve focus and increase concentration. There are several ways to take a mindfulness break, such as meditating in a quiet space, doing a few yoga poses under a tree or taking a mindful walk around your school by consciously focusing on your breath or your senses. What do you hear? What do you smell? What sensations are coming up, and how can you acknowledge those feelings?

3. Create a schoolwide culture of gratitude

Robert Emmons, the world’s leading scientific expert on gratitude, has revealed that gratitude can improve our social, emotional, mental and physical well-being. There are several ways to develop a gratitude routine in your program by building in time at the beginning of each meeting for staff to share gratitude for any other staff member, family or person in our school community. If your organization is new to this practice, be patient and consistent. At first, it may feel uncomfortable for your staff to publicly share gratitude amongst one another, but eventually, it’ll become an important routine that your staff will enjoy! As a school leader, it is incredibly important that we model this practice with our staff. The following quote is my personal mantra for how I live my life, “Feeling gratitude and not expressing it is like wrapping a present and not giving it,” by William Arthur Ward.

4. Embed self-care strategies into PD opportunities

We may not know what the professional development (PD) structure will be like when we reopen. Will it be virtual or in small groups? As program leaders, we have the opportunity to create the conditions for our staff to thrive. One of the ways that we can do this is by embedding self-care strategies into PD events. As a former director of professional development for a large urban school district, one of my proudest accomplishments included adding yoga and mindfulness classes for our staff to participate in… for credit! Find out what fills your staff’s “happy” buckets and incorporate those passions into your PD opportunities. Whether it’s working with a master gardener who can show staff how to plant a garden, structuring your PD so that staff can break out in small groups and have walking discussions outside, or inviting a local yoga instructor to facilitate a trauma-informed learning session, there are plenty of ways that you can embed self-care into your PD plan.

5. Practice self-reflection

Self-reflection is a great way to learn more about yourself, process your emotions and grow positively as a human being. At Educare, “reflective practices require conscious time and intentional thinking about school procedures and classroom activities; they ground staff in their work and build competence and confidence by allowing them the opportunity to consider the “how” and “why” of their roles in relation to children, families and co-workers.” Keep a journal and develop a consistent routine to jot down what’s going on in your life and the world around you. This may help you to process and make sense of current events, challenges and opportunities.

Early on in the pandemic, I came across a quote by florist Cecilia Tran that stuck with me, “Self-care means giving yourself permission to pause.” With so many changes and challenges coming at us, now — more than ever — we need to give ourselves permission to slow down as we focus on the basic needs and well-being of our children, families, staff and most importantly…our self.

Build It Back Better is a project of Start Early focused on identifying the critical questions that early childhood systems and services must ask as we rebuild after the COVID-19 pandemic. The writings that emerge from the initiative center the experiences and voices of those most directly and disproportionately affected by the pandemic’s impact on early care and learning.


Drew Giles, MA, RYT, is an author, kids yoga teacher and leader in early childhood education. Since June 2018, Mr. Giles has served as Director of Educare Programs at Educare California at Silicon Valley, an innovative early learning school that narrows the opportunity gap for low-income children ages 0-5 and their families and caregivers. Drew has a master’s degree in Early Childhood Education and a bachelor’s degree in broadcast journalism.

In this blog, Kristin Bernhard, Start Early senior vice president of policy and advocacy, shares our work towards building back a better early childhood system that addresses and diminishes the inequities that exist for our youngest learners and families.

The COVID-19 pandemic has served as a report card on the status of our society — and not a very flattering one. It has exposed and highlighted the profound inequities, from health care to affordable housing, that exist from coast to coast. We have seen that nearly every aspect of the social safety net is weaker than we had hoped; in particular, the limitations and weaknesses of our country’s early childhood system have been thrown into stark relief.

At the same time, we have been reminded that racism permeates our communities, risking the physical and social-emotional safety and well-being of the children, families and caregivers with whom we work so closely. We have been called upon to renew our collective commitment to racial equity and finally undo generations of institutional racism that continue to traumatically impact children and families.

Now, we have a choice: 1) rebuild the fragile, inequitable early childhood system that was in place prior to the pandemic, 2) or build it back better by collaboratively rethinking and improving early learning and care programs by proactively addressing existing disparities and ensuring that programs meet the needs of children and families. We must work towards the latter.

How?

  • By inviting more voices into the conversation about rebuilding and recovery
  • By identifying gaps in who is represented in these critical conversations and exploring how we can engage with and learn from more diverse groups of partners
  • By centering voices of those most directly and disproportionately affected by the pandemic’s impact and amplifying them to make systemic changes that are responsive to the emergent needs of families and early learning and care programs
  • By pairing the lived experiences of minority and historically under-resourced communities with the Start Early’s research, program, advocacy and policy tools — in order to activate the field to demand that policymakers build back better

In order to do this right, we must engage in conversations about building back a better system where race, ethnicity, zip code, socioeconomic status and other related factors do not predict a child’s growth and development or access to resources.

As we continue to see the detrimental impact of the COVID-19 pandemic unfold, we are, however, also witnessing innovation in action through the responses of providers, communities, policymakers, researchers and countless other early childhood stakeholders. For example:

  • Teachers and other educators have rapidly learned and implemented new technologies to support at-home learning and family engagement efforts.
  • Policy and practice changes have allowed the use of telehealth and other virtual communication tools for home visiting and early intervention services.
  • Researchers have sprung into action to document the experiences of families and service providers.
  • State administrators have streamlined the procedures for accessing child care subsidies and services.

We must acknowledge, applaud and leverage the flexibility and swift action brought on by the pandemic to inform how we rebuild.

Through the Build It Back Better initiative, Start Early is partnering with early childhood stakeholders from across the country to share their challenges, innovative solutions and ideas about what major questions must be asked and considered during this unprecedented time. It is our goal to collaborate with families, communities and local, state and federal leaders to amplify these critical questions and perspectives to best inform decision-makers’ efforts and respond to the changing needs of children, families and practitioners.

As we examine lessons learned so far from this pandemic, we can recreate the conditions in which inequities persist and worsen in crisis — or we can build it back better, more equitably and more sustainably. Now more than ever, we must underscore that ample investment in early learning and care is essential for addressing and diminishing the inequities that exist for our youngest learners and families.

In this blog post, Start Early (formerly the Ounce) policy analyst Kayla Goldfarb, shares parents’ and caregivers’ perspectives on rebuilding and recovery post COVID-19, including specific thoughts on economic security, community mental health and parent advocacy and engagement.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on families and caregivers has been both broad and deep. The extent of economic, social and physical and mental health consequences, to name a few, is still unfolding, while daily life remains profoundly changed for families with young children at home. Yet, as a group of Educare families shared during a May 2020 Build It Back Better dialogue, despite the challenges presented, critical opportunities exist for the rebuilding of our early childhood system to better adapt to and support the needs and goals of families with young children.

Parents and caregivers continue to be concerned about economic security and the availability of both financial assistance and regulatory protections afforded as part of federal COVID-19 relief. As the broader economic effects of the pandemic have overloaded federal and local safety nets, families with young children who relied on public benefits prior to the health crisis have found it increasingly difficult to access supports and basic needs. For example, families who rely on the SNAP program, shortages at grocery stores and a strain on traditional community support systems like food depositories have created a barrier to receiving benefits. Similarly, for families struggling to pay rent, confusion over the patchwork of federal, state and local eviction-protections and the availability of legal recourse has left some families concerned over whether their landlords can still pressure them to pay rent.

For those enrolled in Medicaid, a lack of access to individual mental health services and other support systems has placed an added burden on the ability of families to cope with COVID-19-related pressures. Likewise, parents continue to be concerned about the developmental impacts and mental health needs of their young children who may not understand the changes to daily life. Reflecting on their current experience with early childhood programs, parents expressed a desire for more extensive community mental health services to attend to the needs of the whole family.

“I would like to see more community group therapy work because it’s not affordable when its one-on-one,” Janelle Jenkins, an Educare Denver parent, said. “There are a lot of families that could just use a boost, pulling out strengths and helping them to realize their potential — that’s all they need to get started and for their family to be successful.”

Additional concerns are top of mind for parents and caregivers as they contemplate the “reopening” of their states and return to work. The disruption of routine child care is particularly concerning for parents in essential sectors, like child care, who must now contend with where their own young children will be when they are required to return to work.

“The safety, financial stability, wondering where I am going to put my children in the event that I have to open up earlier, and they have a different tentative date to open?” Toshiba Davis, an Educare Oklahoma City parent and home child care provider, questioned.

While eager to provide support to families and children in their essential roles, reopening means risking the health and safety of their own families. This added, unique tension for caregivers and educators is exacerbated over uncertainty of what safety measures, including class sizes, PPE and business hours, will be in place when services reopen.

“When I do welcome the families back in, am I putting my own family at risk? Those are the things that worry me,” Toshiba shared.

As data continue to reveal the disproportionate health impact of COVID-19 on Black, Indigenous and Latinx communities around the country, we clearly see profound equity issues for the early childhood workforce, which is comprised almost exclusively of women, 40% of whom are people of color.1

Despite these pressing COVID-19 related concerns, parents and caregivers remain focused on the ways in which stronger two-generational supports can more holistically address the needs and desires of families, in times of crisis and beyond.

“In order for our children to have hopes and dreams, parents need to have hopes and dreams,” Toshiba exclaimed. “I would love to see parents in my community get more education, […] so they can be advocates for their own children, because nobody can advocate for your child like you can. But, you’ve got to have the knowledge and the know how to do it.”

Parents and caregivers envision an expanded network of resources outside of the walls of their early learning and care environments, including after school and summer programming and robust math and financial literacy resources, to enable children to reach their potential from their earliest years.

“Financial literacy and education are very important — that’s my hope. It should be in all schools from the time they’re age 0 to 3”, Ealasha Vonner, an Educare Denver parent, said. “That’s my hope and dream because if we did have that in our schools, we would be better off right now.”

Build It Back Better is a project of Start Early focused on identifying the critical questions that early childhood systems and services must ask as we rebuild after the COVID-19 pandemic. The writings that emerge from the initiative center the experiences and voices of those most directly and disproportionately affected by the pandemic’s impact on early care and learning. Join the conversation at the Early Child Connector’s Recovery and Rebuilding Hub.

Kayla Goldfarb is a policy analyst at Start Early, focusing her work primarily on home visiting and providing staffing support to the Home Visiting Task Force, a standing body of the Illinois Early Learning Council. She holds a Master of Public Policy degree from the Humphrey School of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota.


1 Austin, Lea JE, et al. “Racial Wage Gaps in Early Education Employment.” (2019).
https://cscce.berkeley.edu/files/2020/02/RacialWageGaps-Early-Education-Brief.pdf

In May 2020, the Illinois General Assembly approved the state’s Fiscal Year 2021 budget plan, and on June 10, Governor J.B. Pritzker signed the budget into law. See below for Start Early’s (formerly known as the Ounce) complete point of view on the state’s approved investments in children and families.


MAY 26, 2020

Over the weekend, the Illinois General Assembly approved the state’s Fiscal Year 2021 budget plan, which we anticipate Gov. J.B. Pritzker will sign into law. We applaud the legislature for passing a budget amid a global pandemic that sustains state funding for early childhood programs and provides the administration the authority to spend significant federal resources on the early care and education system.

The budget package includes:

  • $7 million increase to the Early Intervention program at the Illinois Department of Human Services (IDHS) to accommodate the state’s growing caseload
    Level-funding for the Child Care Assistance Program at IDHS
  • The legislature increased the federal appropriation for the child care program by $138 million to allow for the spending of federal CCDBG and CARES Act funding in the current and upcoming fiscal year.
  • Level-funding for evidence-based home visiting programs for expectant and new parents through Healthy Families and Parents Too Soon at IDHS
    Level-funding for the Early Childhood Block Grant at the Illinois State Board of Education

In addition, the legislature appropriated more than $500 million in federal CARES Act funding to the Coronavirus Business Interruption Grant Program (or BIG Program) to reimburse costs or losses incurred due to business interruption caused by required COVID-19-related closures. $260 million of that funding is to be directed toward a program for child care providers. These grants will help protect the health of the state’s early childhood mixed-delivery system.

Unfortunately, it will be challenging to implement this budget plan fully because of COVID-19’s impact on the state’s economy. The administration’s decision on how to proceed will depend on future federal relief packages and the state’s economic recovery. We will share more information as it becomes available.

But states cannot weather this storm alone, which is why we call on Congress to direct additional federal early childhood resources – through trusted programs like the Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV) or the Child Care Development Block Grant (CCDBG) – to states like Illinois to protect the system we’ve spent years to build.

We thank the legislature for affirming the state’s commitment to the health and sustainability of the early care and education system despite our ongoing fiscal challenges. The recent crisis has exacerbated the needs of families, certainly among those already lacking equitable services and opportunity. It has also brought into sharp relief the essential nature of the work performed by professionals throughout the early childhood system – workers whose efforts are central to the well-being of children, families and communities.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic we’d hoped to see more state funding included in the FY 2021 budget for these core early care and education programs. However, given the dramatic changes of the past two months, the budget package approved by the legislature does provide much-needed stability to the state’s early childhood system.

Fast Facts

Sine Die
Under somber conditions, the Legislature adjourned “sine die” on Day 60, March 13. The increasing COVID-19 crisis dominated the Capitol campus, as expected. When the budget conference committee released the details of the operating budget on Wednesday, budget writers expressed concern for all Washingtonians, noting the ending fund balance was increased over the previous Senate and House budgets in recognition that the budget impacts of COVID-19 will likely exceed the $200 million allocated from the Budget Stabilization Account (otherwise known as the Rainy Day Fund) for the state’s response. Typically Sine Die is a celebratory event. This year, the Capitol campus emptied quickly upon conclusion of legislative business.

Status of Early Learning Bills

The bills listed below are on their way to the Governor’s desk for action. Each represents a great deal of work and compromise—congratulations to those who worked on them and a huge thanks to the legislative champions.

  • ESHB 2455 related to eligibility for Working Connections Child Care for teenage mothers pursuing their high school diploma or GED.
  • SHB 2456 related to extending the grace period to meet work requirements for families experiencing homelessness from four to twelve months.
  • SHB 2556 related to developing community-based pathways for child care provider educational requirements.
  • HB 2619 related to increasing child care access in rural communities.
  • ESSB 6540 related to Working Connections Child Care 12-month authorization timing.

Supplemental Operating and Capital Budgets Adopted

Probably the most significant charge facing the Legislature was adoption of the supplemental budgets. There are three budgets—operating, capital and transportation.

In reviewing these investments, It is important to recognize the level of uncertainty we face given COVID-19. When presenting the conference report, Senate Ways and Means Chair Christine Rolfes commented about returning in January “or sooner.” Read the summary below of the early learning related items.

Read Summary

What's Next?

Attention Turns to the Governor

With the Legislature leaving Olympia, attention now shifts to Gov. Inslee as he reviews all of the bills passed this session. Bills delivered to the governor fewer than five days before adjourned have 20 days to be acted on by the governor. Here is where you can track the bill signing schedule.

How is the Coronavirus Impacting Bill Signings?

On Monday, the governor’s office announced he would not be holding public bill signings, in an attempt to promote “social distancing” to reduce the risk of the coronavirus. Instead, the bill’s sponsor plus one guest will be allowed at each bill signing and the signings will be carried on TVW.org.

Fast Facts

Legislative Process Marches On

After lengthy Saturday hearings and very late Monday sessions, the final fiscal cutoff was met. Action immediately shifted Tuesday morning to the House and Senate floors where the bodies debated and considered bills from the opposite chambers. The deadline for bills to be passed out of the opposite chamber is Friday, March 6th at 5:00 p.m. More often than not, there is bipartisan agreement on bills, but there are always hot-button bills that bring impassioned debate.

One of those hot button bills relates to Comprehensive Sexual Education and the House debated this measure until after 2:00 a.m. Thursday morning, spending more than six hours on one bill (it passed on a party line vote). Time can be one of the biggest threats to the success of a bill. Both bodies only have so much time before cutoff deadlines and must prioritize which bills they will hear. And because the Senate votes by voice, votes in that Chamber can take a long time, particularly when there are voice votes on amendments.

Status of Early Learning Bills

All of the active early learning bills are out of Rules and moving through the process. The time question mentioned above may be the biggest challenge. One bill where there are differing opinions between the House and Senate is SHB 2456 relating to the grace period for Working Connections Child Care for families experiencing homelessness. The House wants to see the current four-month grace period extended to 12-months, while the Senate prefers an extension from four-months to six-months.

One early learning bill that has received action in both bodies is HB 2619. Because that bill was not amended in the Senate (nor in the the House, which is rare), it will go straight to the Governor for action. Sponsored by Whatcom County’s Representative Shewmake, HB 2619 would make a number of actions, including allowing Working Connections Child Care subsidies to be equal or higher than private pay rates; requires DCYF to develop recommendations to improve rural child care access; and to create a pilot to create a dual license for foster care and child care.

Coronavirus Response

Not surprisingly, the evolving coronavirus (COVID-19) situation received a great deal of attention at the Capitol this week. On Monday, the Senate Ways and Means Committee heard an update from Department of Health Secretary Dr. John Wiesman and Jaime Bodden, the Managing Director of the Washington State Association of Local Public Health Officials.

At that hearing, Secretary Wiesman recommended Washington state invest $100 million to combat the virus at the state and local levels. On Tuesday, the House unanimously passed a bill that would remove $100 million from the state’s Rainy Day Fund to support the government’s response. The Senate followed suit on Wednesday and Gov. Inslee is expected to sign the bill in short order. If the full amount is not needed, it can be returned to the Rainy Day Fund.

As budget writers finalize the final budget, there is widespread speculation revenue projections may be adjusted downward in anticipation of the negative economic impacts of this public health incident.

What's Next?

It’s Nearly the Bottom of the Ninth…

At this time, all signs indicate an on-time completion on the scheduled date of March 12. We expect budget negotiators to release a compromise budget next week that will be voted on by both bodies and then sent to the Governor. Legislators will also be busy finalizing action on bills next week, concurring in the other body’s amendments or going to conference where there is disagreement on amendments made. Next week’s update will include a synopsis of final budget components.

Early Childhood Hero: Brittany Evans
Brittany Evans
Early Childhood Hero: Jackie Evans
Jackie Evans

In 2014, Congress addressed the child care crisis by appropriating $500 million to expand access to Early Head Start, which included the creation of a new Early Head Start–Child Care Partnerships program (Partnerships). Tulsa Educare was awarded two of the three Early Head Start-Child Care Partnerships grants (rounds 1 and 3) and currently supports six family child care homes and one center, with additional centers set to open in August 2020. One of the child care homes that Tulsa Educare currently partners with is Aunt Jackie’s Family Childcare owned and operated by Jacqueline (Jackie) Evans.

We recently interviewed Jackie Evans along with Brittany Egger, the director of Child Care Partnerships and Quality Assurance at Tulsa Educare. They shared their thoughts on the impact of the Partnerships on the Tulsa community, the challenges they face, and their hopes for the future of infant/toddler care.

  1. Tell us a little bit about your relationship/partnership. How did it originally come to be? What does it look like now?
    Jackie and I met after we received notification that we were awarded the [EHS-CCP Partnerships] grant. Unbeknownst to us, Jackie and Caren Calhoun, our executive director at the time, had worked with each other years before. This helped jump-start her trust with Tulsa Educare. We began slowly. The first time I went to her house we just sat at her kitchen table and she told me about her program. I observed the children and did parent engagement events to build trust with her staff and her families.
  2. From your perspective, what has been the impact of the Partnerships program across the Tulsa community?
    Family Child Care Homes are an integral part of the Tulsa community. The level of family partnerships and bonding that occurs is hard to duplicate in a center-based program. Jackie has a passion for increasing the number of high-quality family child care homes across her community. With our newest Partnerships grant, we chose to partner with five new family child care homes.
  3. What challenges have you faced participating in the Partnerships program? How have you addressed those challenges?
    With any change there are challenges. How are we going to do all this new required paperwork? When do we have time for this in our already busy day? With the staff, are they going to want to go back to school to get their Child Development Associate Certificates? All of these were challenges. However, working together to restructure daily schedules and assign responsibilities to all staff, we were able to easily adjust to the new regulations and demands. Jackie’s staff completed their CDAs within their first year, and have now completed both their Certificate of Mastery and are working on their Associate Degrees. The new regulations were challenging, but brought a level of professionalism to the home that wasn’t there before.
  4. What is your big, bold hope for the future of infant/toddler care in Oklahoma?
    That all children have equal access to high-quality programs and caregivers have more options for specific infant/toddler training. Additionally, that Oklahoma can bridge the divide between child care programs and public school programs. We hope for these things because we all know that the quality of care, experiences, and opportunities children have in the very early years can predict future success.

In 2000, Start Early developed the first Educare school to serve children and families on the South Side of Chicago. At the time, the community was rebuilding after the demolition of the Robert Taylor Homes, one of the largest public housing developments in the country.

Educare logoSince then, we’ve partnered with diverse communities and early childhood champions to build a national network of 25 birth-through-age 5 Educare schools and improve access to quality early education across the country. Our shared goal is to help our most vulnerable children enter kindergarten ready to learn. Start Early serves as the national coordinating office of the Educare Learning Network, providing strategic alignment and functional support to the Network and our partners.

To achieve our goal, the Educare Learning Network builds strong public-private partnerships across the country to create strong schools and longtime champions who will amplify our call for change. We collaborate as a Network to advocate at the local, state and federal levels for policies and programs that advance our mission and support quality improvement and supports for our youngest learners and their families in communities that are under-resourced.

Through our work on the Early Head Start-Child Care Partnerships (Partnerships) program — created by Congress in 2014 — reaches across policy, practice and research to improve early education nationwide. Through the program, grantees are able to provide local child care programs that agree to meet Head Start Program Performance Standards with a range of supports (e.g., infrastructure improvements, higher teacher pay). Partnerships grantees partner with local center-based and family child care programs and leverage community resources to expand access to high-quality early care and learning for families who are working but earning wages below the federal poverty level.

Currently, 13 Educare organizations in 12 states and the District of Columbia administer Partnership grants with a variety of partners including local child care centers, family child care homes, school districts, nonprofit organizations, homeless shelters, and other community organizations. The number and type of community partners vary by grantee, as do the number of infants and toddlers served (from 60 to over 600), geographic distances covered and the role of the Educare organization in the Partnership.

In addition to Educare organizations administering grants, the Educare Learning Network advocates to protect and expand this program at the state and federal levels and shares our best practices and policy recommendations with the field. In 2019, we partnered with the Bipartisan Policy Center and the First Five Years Fund to put forth a policy recommendation, titled “The Early Head Start – Child Care Partnerships: Flexibility With Accountability,” summarizing our shared Partnerships work across the country and program recommendations. In 2020, we launched an article series called “A Path to High-Quality Child Care through Partnerships,” featuring stories from Educare organizations’ Partnerships across the country and highlighting the impact of COVID-19 on Partnerships grantees, their child care partners and the families they serve. The series and offers our unique policy recommendations to maintain, improve, and grow our nation’s supply of quality infant toddler child care.

Visit EducareSchools.org

In this blog, Kristin Bernhard, Start Early senior vice president of policy and advocacy, identifies an innovative policy solution that is addressing our nation’s child care crisis. This approach, Early Head Start-Child Care Partnerships, raises the bar for quality infant-toddler care. 

Our nation is in a child care crisis — particularly for infant and toddler care — and this issue is finally hitting the mainstream. Rarely a week goes by without a new article, report, or shocking statistic drawing attention to the sad fact that in its current form, the financing for child care in America is broken. The quality of services is inconsistent at best and most state- and federally-funded programs serve only a fraction of eligible families. This broken system is failing to promote the healthy development of our youngest learners and failing to support their parents, especially those who need child care so that they can work or go to school.

What’s more, child care providers in every state make near-poverty wages, while parents, especially those earning low wages, cannot afford to pay what it costs to deliver the high-quality early care and learning that research tells us sets the foundation for academic achievement, health, and well-being later in life.

However, this crisis is not purely a money issue. Current cries for additional funding for “child care for all” are shortsighted if they do not take into account the limitations of our current market-based system and the time and effort needed to make the necessary improvements in quality in order to truly realize the two-generation impacts of early childhood education. Access to child care alone is not sufficient if attention – and funding – is not also paid to improving the quality of the care provided and reshaping the way these services interact with families.

While the federally-funded, locally-run Early Head Start model was created in 1994 to address the comprehensive needs of children under age 3, the seemingly high costs per child, consistently low levels of federal funding, and increasing rates of child poverty have limited the program’s impact. As of 2017, less than 10% of eligible children nationwide were served by Early Head Start.

That is why the Early Head Start-Child Care Partnerships (Partnerships) are one promising policy solution that should merit serious consideration by those tackling the child care crisis across the country. The Partnerships launched in 2014 as a new approach to delivering the Early Head Start model by supporting traditional early childhood centers and family providers in meeting and delivering early education and wrap around supports at Early Head Start standards.

This innovative approach allowed Early Head Start to extend beyond a limited number of centers and expand to community-based providers. As part of this effort, children enrolled in a community-based program received the wrap-around supports and comprehensive services, regardless of the funding stream paying their slot. Teachers in such programs also received enhanced professional development and coaching, resources to complete postsecondary education, and support in implementing research-based curricula — all while being paid a worthy wage.

Start Early has been involved with the Partnerships since the first funding was authorized. Six years later, it is important to tell the story of the Partnerships’ effectiveness; not just their influence on families and child care providers, but also their impact on state early childhood systems that adapted and innovated to support the success of the program. To tell this story, we interviewed a variety of state leaders to understand the impact the Partnerships had in reshaping infant-toddler child care in their states.

We found that the Partnerships raised the bar for high-quality infant and toddler care, as expected, but that they also served as an important impetus for systems-level change. The full story can be found in our report, Expanding High-Quality Child Care for Infants & Toddlers: Lessons from Implementation of Early Head Start — Child Care Partnerships in States.

So what do these findings mean for our current child care crisis? There is growing momentum around finding new and innovative solutions to this problem, which is certainly cause for optimism. However, as our nation pulls together to put new solutions for child care on the table, the lessons learned from the implementation of the Early Head Start-Child Care Partnerships should be at the center of the conversation.

Partnership for Pre-K Improvement logoThe Partnership for Pre-K Improvement (PPI) was launched in 2017 to learn together with states about how to build quality, equitable pre-K systems that ensure children succeed in school and in life. The initiative’s unique approach fosters partnerships across program, advocacy, and research organizations in support of a common vision for pre-K systems improvement.

Through the initiative, three states — Washington, Oregon and Tennessee — are partnering to strengthen the program policies, infrastructure, and resources necessary for high-quality pre-K that will result in improved classroom quality and outcomes for children.

Partnership for Pre-K Improvement partnership graphic

State partners are supported by the following organizations, who work together and in concert with other national and state program, advocacy and research partners. Start Early acts as the backbone organization, facilitating collaboration.

  • Start Early engages state government leaders to create strategic plans to build the system capacity and infrastructure needed for continuous improvement of quality pre-K.
  • The Alliance for Early Success supports advocacy organizations to build advocacy capacity to ensure the policies and resources essential to quality pre-K are in place.
  • Cultivate Learning at the University of Washington engages local researchers to build research-practice partnerships with states and generate data for continuous quality improvement of pre-K.

Leaders in each state have made meaningful improvements to their systems, including data, professional learning, and instructional leadership infrastructure that contribute to continuous improvement of pre-K. Additionally, local organizations in each state have built strong partnerships across program, advocacy and research to sustain pre-K systems improvements long into the future.

Based on this learning, PPI partners are collaboratively creating tools and generating knowledge to help other states and communities apply this program, advocacy, research approach and thereby continue improvement beyond the life of the project.